“democratic candidates”

It was September 2008 and I was in a radio studio with G. Gordon Liddy, the man’s man not even prison could break; a man whose 1980 book, Will, made me view fear as if it were nothing more than the hot breath of a dare—and I’d read his book when I was 10 years old.

If one of these anti-gun politicians wins the presidency, what then? Let’s just take their word for it.

Michael Bloomberg is the Grinch of modern American politics. Bloomberg lives a separate, elitist lifestyle guarded by men with guns.

Background checks for 2019 exceeded all other years on record.

It’s hard to imagine that Joe Biden could outdo himself with a gun-control proposal even more absurd than his DNA-activated smart gun, but our imagination is apparently more constrained by truth and facts than that of the former vice president.

In this election season, even simple reporting of these candidates’ positions on the Second Amendment would sound like hyperbole to anyone who, say, has been off the grid for a few years.

The good thing about social media is it allows people to air their opinions publicly and immediately with no filter. The bad thing about social media is that it allows people to air their opinions publicly and immediately with no filter.

When gun control came up at the second Democratic presidential debate, South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D) rattled off the usual list of gun-control restrictions most of the Democratic candidates have publicly endorsed and added in something from 2002. He proposed changes to how money is spent by associations and others in politics.

What do you call a man who runs for the nation’s highest office specifically on a platform of gun control and who believes modern mass media does a fantastic job of “uphold[ing] the promise of our Constitution”?