“assault weapons ban”

You may remember Dianna Muller from when she testified before Congress in 2019. Many seemed surprised by her strong statements, especially coming from a retired police officer.

The text of the Second Amendment is explicit, and since it is a right, the people, not the government, decide. Yet, gun-control activists are still intent on attempting to define exactly what "arms" are protected by it.

With a renewed attack on your rights, it’s important to be informed.

President Joe Biden keeps repeating the lie that Congress must "repeal the liability shield that makes gun manufacturers the only industry in America that can't be sued." The thing is, no such shield exits.

If there’s anything that illustrates how badly President Biden completely misunderstands the concept of basic freedom, it is his recent call for an “assault weapons” ban in the midst of Ukrainian citizens being handed tens of thousands of actual assault rifles.

Guns owners and gun-rights supporters must remain vigilant in the fight against those who try to force their anti-gun agenda on the average law-abiding, pro-gun American.

The boundaries that have defined the gun debate are fracturing. One demonstration of this is the amicus brief filed by the Black Attorneys of Legal Aid (BALA), the Bronx Defenders and others in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association (NYSRPA) v. Bruen, now before the U.S. Supreme Court. Bruen is a challenge to New York’s expensive and restrictive firearms permitting scheme.

Criminal violence has been rising in our cities, but the fault is hardly with Americans' guns.

The mainstream media considers most facts about guns to be inconvenient to their narratives, so they simply don’t cite or explore them.