Only Laughing On The Outside

by
posted on May 8, 2015
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
header_1500x844_2.jpg

Right now I’m a sad clown. I’m smiling and laughing on the outside, but inside I’m pissed, a little hurt and embarrassed. I’m standing in a room full of people, some I know and some I don’t, and my friends are patting me down to see if I have a gun on me. This is their idea of a joke, because as they so eloquently put it, I’m the gunman, Mr. NRA, and I could be packing at any given moment. It takes the power of the Holy Spirit not to lash out in a tirade of expletives out of sheer mortification. 

This is the juvenile bullshit they do, I say to myself as I continue smiling and laughing through gritted teeth while they finish patting me down. That day I didn’t have my gun on me, so they come up with nothing. I can only wonder what the response would have been if they came upon my Kahr PM9, which I usually carry when I’m wearing a suit. This group of friends isn’t exactly pro-gun, so they take pleasure in mocking something that I take very seriously. Going about your life activities with a gun is a big responsibility, and one that many anti-gunners aren’t willing to take on. So they do to you what the class clown does to the straight-A student: They mock you for what they call taking yourself “too seriously.” 

As much as I want to believe this level of juvenility regarding the issue of guns is unique to this particular group of friends, I have noticed a rather pervasive culture of anti-gunners who engage in the same type of behavior. I don’t take myself too seriously, but when it comes to guns? I enjoy them, I have fun, but I take them very seriously. I find it ironic that the same group of people who will argue against guns because they don’t trust people to own and carry them responsibly are incapable of talking about them without marring the conversation with childish arguments.  

I’ve always found it hard to say that carrying a gun makes me comfortable in knowing I won’t be completely helpless if I were to ever be attacked. When you say things like this to people who don’t carry a gun, or simply don’t like them, they, without fail, go straight to the assumption that I must be overcompensating for a lack of girth and length in the reproductive parts of my anatomy.  

This line of assault is what I call “ego shaming.” At its core, it’s nothing more than a juvenile ad hominem attack. It’s a cheap way to dismiss someone’s very valid reasons for carrying a gun. In the past I found myself falling victim to this form of ego shaming. The idea that I was somehow carrying a gun to overcompensate instilled in me a sense of insecurity that I never possessed prior to carrying a gun. It’s not like I could just drop my pants and say, “See, that’s not true at all.”  

When you start carrying a gun, it changes your perspective on life. For the vast majority of people, it causes them to appreciate life in a way that someone who does not carry can’t completely comprehend. Going about your life activities with a gun is a big responsibility, and one that many anti-gunners aren’t willing to take on. So they do to you what the class clown does to the straight-A student: They mock you for what they call taking yourself “too seriously.” You can never take carrying a gun too seriously. It can be a lifeline when you need it, and there’s nothing funny about life and death.  

At this point my friends were amused with themselves, until one of the guys standing in the group walked over to me and said: “I’ve been meaning to talk to you. My wife and I have been thinking about buying our first gun and wanted to get your advice on which one to get.” The look on my friends’ faces was priceless when another person spoke up and said the same thing. I guess that whole saying about catching more flies with honey than with vinegar has some truth to it.

Latest

2_aff_feature_mainstreamtruth.jpg
2_aff_feature_mainstreamtruth.jpg

Part 3: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—Journalism’s Future

Given how turned off the public is, what is the future of the news media, and is there any chance market forces could make its treatment of this individual right fairer?

Virginia is Going After the Peoples’ Guns

As Virginia’s Democrat-controlled General Assembly and Senate move gun-control bills through committees, residents need to contact their representatives to let them know neither they, nor their guns, are to blame for crime.

Part 2: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—the Death of Local News

The demise of newspapers, small and large, has been well chronicled, but how this has impacted America’s most practical civil right, our right to keep and bear arms, has not often been considered.

 

The Armed Citizen® January 21, 2026

Around 7 a.m. on Nov. 7, 2025, near Los Angeles, a 79-year-old Vietnam War veteran heard his duplex tenant screaming. He found a naked 30-year-old man had forced his way into the woman’s home.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division is Hiring Second Amendment Attorneys

After Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Civil Rights Division, was a guest on Gun Talk Media with Tom Gresham, NRA-ILA reported that Dhillon is “embracing a new style of litigation on behalf of the Second Amendment.”

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.