The Cost of New Jersey Gun Control

by
posted on June 29, 2015
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
a1fd_carol_bowne_main_6-29.jpg

Carol Bowne was under no illusions; she knew that she was in danger. Her ex-boyfriend, Michael Eitel, had a history of violence and an overt desire to cause her harm. The New Jersey hairdresser added a home security system complete with cameras, and she filed a protective order to keep Eitel away from her. But she knew that all of these precautions were liable to fail her in the end, so she began the procedures required in the state to purchase a handgun.

This was in April. Carol Bowne was fatally stabbed in her driveway on June 10. At the time of her death, Bowne was unarmed—her firearm permit application still under consideration by the state of New Jersey.

No matter how often various bureaucratic hurdles to gun ownership raised in the name of “common-sense laws” are demonstrated to be ineffective, it is widely assumed by many that at least they do no harm. But Bowne’s situation could hardly be clearer. She very well might be alive had she been able to purchase a gun at the time when she knew she needed it.

Jane Shivas, executive director for the New Jersey Coalition for Battered Women (and notably affiliated with Everytown for Gun Safety) was quoted soon afterwards as saying, “We will never know whether Carol would be alive today if she had received her gun permit and purchased a gun.” It is true that we will never have the chance to know with certainty what would have transpired. But we know that her attacker, with a knife, outmatched Bowne and took her life.

“My friend didn’t have to die that way,” one of Bowne’s co-workers said recently. “He killed her like an animal, and I will never rest knowing that that’s the way my friend’s life was ended because she couldn’t protect herself. And knowing that it could have been prevented makes it all that much more painful … and hard to digest.”

Carol Bowne’s friends and family are not motivated by a political agenda when they point out the needlessness of her death. They see that she took reasonable precautions and applied for her firearm permit well in advance—and was failed by a restrictive permitting system and a state that failed to process her application despite the numerous police reports she filed against Eitel. They want Carol Bowne back, and they can’t understand why it had to end this way.

For a more detailed look at this story, watch Ginny Simone’s new investigative report on Carol Bowne on the NRA News website.

Latest

William A. Bachenberg
William A. Bachenberg

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

More than a Quarter Million Suppressor eForms Have Been Processed by the ATF this Month

When the $200 tax stamp on suppressors and other restricted items was set to be zeroed out at midnight on December 31, 2025, last summer, it was a given that demand would explode on January 1, 2026.

Fourth Circuit Reaffirms That the Second Amendment Does Not End at the Storefront Door

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit struck down Maryland’s attempt to impose a sweeping “default ban” on lawful concealed carry on private property open to the public.

The U.S. Supreme Court Hears Wolford v. Lopez

Today (January 20), the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on Hawaii’s ban on carrying guns on private property that is open to the public—at least unless the property owner has given express consent for the carrying of guns.

What the Supreme Court Justices Said About Hawaii’s Carry Restrictions

The U.S. Supreme Court heard Wolford v. Lopez. It is a challenge to Hawaii’s law banning citizens with permits to carry handguns from going armed on any private property in the state unless the property owner has given express permission to do so. Here is what was said.

 



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.