Germans Turn to Gas Pistols, Pepper Spray for Self-Defense due to Gun Restrictions

by
posted on May 12, 2019
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
administration-architecture-berlin-german-flag.jpg
Although more Germans are seeking gun licenses to protect themselves, their options for self-defense are very limited. Citizens applying for a “small weapons license” find that they don’t have much to work with. 

Unlike Americans who have a right to bear arms and purchase firearms for self-defense, Germans are subject to among the strictest gun-control laws in Europe.

The amount of German citizens seeking weapons for self-defense has doubled at a time when Europe has seen an increase of terrorist attacks. Since 2014, Germany has issued approximately 600,000 basic weapons licenses—a 130 percent jump in the last five years.

“Obviously, people believe they are buying safety with a small gun license,” noted a German minister in Saxony-Anhalt.

One of the most high-profile terrorist attacks on German soil was the Berlin Christmas Market attack in December 2016; prior to the attack, the perpetrator was well-known to German authorities as a radical Islamist, but was not apprehended.

This situation was met with indignation by much of the German general public in the aftermath of the attack and helped create a loss of public trust in German security services.This was followed by a sharp series of terrorist attacks in 2017 that occurred in London, Russia, Sweden and in other locations in Germany.

But what protection will Germans actually gain from their new gun licenses? Not the type of self-defense that a person with serious safety concerns might expect. 

The German “basic weapons license” limits a person to carrying the following arms:

  • Gas pistols,
  • Flare pistols,
  • Stun guns,
  • Pepper spray, and
  • Other small non-lethal weapons.

Furthermore, these “small weapons” are only for emergency use and are not allowed to be carried in public in Germany.

When faced with a life of death situation, a German small-arms license bearer can defend themselves against a likely armed assailant using a cloud of pepper spray, a flare, or burst of a teargas-like substance from gas signal guns.

Germany has no constitutional right to bear arms in its legal tradition. “It restricts the acquisition, possession, and carrying of firearms to those with a creditable need for a weapon. It bans fully automatic weapons and severely restricts the acquisition of other types of weapons. Compulsory liability insurance is required for anyone who is licensed to carry firearms.”

To obtain a license for non-lethal guns, it is necessary to prove that the applicant is reliable, knows how to use the technology, has expertise in the firearm, has lived in Germany for five years, and has an actual need for the gun.

Some German officials have expressed concern that the improper use of pepper spray and non-lethal gas pistols could increase violence in the country. However, there is “a growing sense of public insecurity” in Germany.

 “While Germany has strict gun control laws, it’s arguably not that difficult to obtain a license for non-lethal weapons. The applicant has to be at least 18 years old, though convicted felons, alcohol or drug addicts and people with a record of mental illness are barred.”

The fact that so many Germans are legally applying for small arms permits is an indication of their law-abiding mindset and commitment to following rules.

However, as in America, it is likely the criminals that the Germans hope to protect themselves from will not follow the same rules as law-abiding citizens do when obtaining firearms.

Latest

17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg
17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg

Another Example of What Actual Free Speech Does for the Second Amendment

This is the sort of truth bombing X can now give us—thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social-media site—if we are discerning about who we follow and take the time to be cautious about what we believe.

Hawaii Wants to Go Further Than Mere “Aloha Spirit” in Defiance of Citizens’ Rights

Within weeks of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, Hawaii lawmakers are moving on legislation to find other ways to keep citizens’ Second Amendment rights effectively off-limits.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

In a poignant rebuke of the Massachusetts handgun roster, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Granata v. Campbell.

Armed Citizen Interview: NYC Homeowner

Moshe Borukh heard glass breaking downstairs in his Jamaica Estates home in Queens, N.Y., around 2:40 a.m. Borukh grabbed his pistol and investigated. He soon discovered that a man was inside his home.

Why Did This NFL Offensive Tackle Get Arrested in NYC?

Rasheed Walker thought he was following the law when he declared he had an unloaded Glock 9 mm pistol in a locked case to a Delta Air Lines employee at LaGuardia Airport in New York City on January 23.

The NRA Weighs in on “Unlawful Users”

With the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled to hear United States v. Hemani on March 2, the NRA, along with the Independence Institute and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.