Judge Rules Suit Against FBI Can Proceed

posted on March 27, 2017

A federal judge has ruled that a lawsuit against the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) over the background check on convicted mass murderer Dylan Roof can proceed. 

According to a report at upi.com, U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel noted, “The FBI apparently gave up its attempt to learn about Roof's purportedly felonious drug arrest, and it took no action to prevent Roof from being allowed to purchase a handgun. The FBI cast aside the case, leaving it in a ‘Delayed’ status, and so, on April 16, 2015, Roof was permitted to purchase his Glock.”

Roof was convicted in December of 33 hate-related crimes from an attack on an African-American church where he killed nine people. The plaintiffs claim the FBI failed to manage its own database or perform a proper background check on Roof when he purchased the handgun and applied for a background check, adding that a prior arrest—for possession of medication without a prescription—should have eliminated him from purchasing the weapon.

Latest

AP930691352982
AP930691352982

The Real Data on Violent-Crime Rates

While much of the mainstream media are quick to prop up President Joe Biden’s (D) failed administration with reports that violent crime is falling dramatically in the United States, a new analysis by the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) proves those reports to be untrue.

The Armed Citizen® April 26, 2024

True stories of the right to keep and bear arms.

Shooting Straight With Robert J. Cottrol

Robert J. Cottrol, a law and history professor, noticed that a lot of Americans need to better understand the Second Amendment. He decided to do something about it.

SCOTUS to Hear Another Second Amendment Case

The U.S. Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear a case that challenges the ATF’s so-called “ghost gun” rule later this year.

Trump Promises to Protect the Second Amendment

With a full arena watching at the NRA Great American Outdoor Show, Trump was met with repeated cheers. Here is what he had to say.

Hawaiian Judges Thinks the “Spirit of Aloha” Invalidates Our Rights

These Hawaiian judges decided that the words plainly written in the state’s constitution don’t actually mean what they say.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.