Lawyers Examine Distant History As “Good Reason” Case Kicks Off

posted on November 21, 2015

The District of Columbia’s “good reason” requirement for the issuance of a concealed-carry permit is under review by the district’s federal appeals court. Much of the debate on Friday centered over the legitimacy of the injunction decided by District Court Judge Frederick J. Scullen Jr., who determined that the requirement is at variance with the Second Amendment.

The crucial nature of this case has inspired some unusual and detailed historical analysis from both sides in the debate. Attorneys for the city and Everytown for Gun Safety pointed to an English statute from 1328 (before firearms were available in the country), while a brief whose authors included the legal team from the California Rifle and Pistol Association pointed to a 1686 ruling acquitting a man who carried a gun in public. Both sides want to come away from this case with bulletproof legal precedent and will go back as far as necessary to build it.

Latest

The Armed Citizen
The Armed Citizen

The Armed Citizen® February 14, 2025

True stories of the right to keep and bear arms

How USAID Funded the War on the Second Amendment

For years, American taxpayers have unknowingly been funding ideological crusades that have little to do with the nation’s interests and everything to do with advancing leftist causes.

Anti-Gun Extremists Never Rest

Court activity seems to never rest and neither do anti-gun extremists who want to deprive citizens of the right to bear arms.

Gun Skills | Reloading 2: Basic Equipment

A simple array of tools is all that is needed to start handloading.

Gun Review | Beretta 30X Tomcat

Beretta did an excellent job of updating this classic. It has tweaks, but retains the features that made it so popular in the first place.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.