Mass Shooting "Researcher" Refuses To Reveal His Data

posted on July 30, 2016
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **

Faced with withering criticism of a study of mass shootings in 171 countries over 46 years, a University of Alabama professor is refusing to share the data he used to report his findings.

Adam Lankford published a study in the journal “Violence and Victims” claiming that more mass shootings occur in countries with more guns. When challenged, however, Lankford refused to provide any details to back up his findings, such as how he compiled data from poor, non-English speaking developing countries going back almost a half-century. “Lankford does not claim to be able to read all the languages used in those 171 nations, or to have made use of others with this ability,” said Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck. “This method would result in near-total omission of relevant news stories outside of the English-speaking part of the world.” 

Lankford also refused to provide FoxNews.com his data, saying he may share his methods with fellow scholars at a later date. Editors at “Violence and Victims” said it was not their job to fact-check content, saying the study was reviewed by two unnamed “established researchers with expertise in … gun-related violence”—which is often code for “gun-control advocates.”

This lack of transparency casts major doubt on Lankford’s findings. “No qualified scholar would accept work by a researcher who could not, or would not, even explain exactly how he measured his most important variable,” Kleck said.

Latest

William A. Bachenberg
William A. Bachenberg

President’s Column | What a Year It Has Been!

Wow! How fast a year has gone by since being elected president at the end of April last year! My first column was titled “It’s A New Day At The NRA,” and included the following:

Standing Guard | We Are the Good Citizens

I am a big believer in transparency. Each individual needs privacy from unconstitutional government intrusion—this especially includes what guns a law-abiding American citizen might own—but an association of freedom-loving citizens must be transparent.

U.S. v. Hemani Arguments

On March 2, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in U.S. v. Hemani. The case involves a defendant who is fighting a federal indictment for possessing a firearm while being a marijuana user.

President’s Column | Getting You Up to Speed

A lot of things have occurred over the past month or so that not all members are completely aware of. I’ll use my column this month to update you on some important issues—transparency.

Standing Guard | The NRA Gathers to Celebrate Our Freedom

The momentum we’re seeing across the country is both encouraging and energizing. January opened with tremendous activity at the NRA booth during SHOT Show, where members, industry partners and supporters stopped by to connect, share ideas and reaffirm their commitment to freedom and the Second Amendment.

Port Authority Doubles Down on Constitution-Free Zone with High-Profile Arrest

As anyone who has passed a basic civics class knows, the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. All legislation and official government actions are subject to its limits.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.