NDAA Passes Senate Without Anti-Gun Provisions

by
posted on December 18, 2021
remote.jpeg

In another example of why we must stay ever-vigilant, the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) nearly had a pair of anti-gun provisions included in it. These were omitted from the final, recently approved version thanks to the diligent work of pro-Second Amendment legislators and the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (ILA).

This annual, bipartisan legislation directs the funding for our military and national-security programs. That two anti-gun provisions were forced into the House-passed version of the NDAA illustrates why we must always be prepared to fight back against those who wish to curtail our freedoms. 

The first of the pair, spearheaded by Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.), would have allowed for the confiscation of personally-owned firearms, without due process, for military members. “This would have represented a clear denial of constitutional due process and a stunning betrayal of those who swore an oath to protect and defend our country and the U.S. Constitution,” reported NRA-ILA.

The other provision was an amendment from Rep. Norma Torres (D-Calif.) that would have changed regulations crafted by the Trump administration. These regulations were designed to enhance the competitiveness of American companies in the firearms and ammunition sectors, while simultaneously removing burdens on gunsmiths and other small businesses. They also modernize export controls and enhance national security.

Instead, Torres’ proposed amendment would have given power to anti-Second Amendment lawmakers in what is normally an administrative exercise. This would lead to numerous, unnecessary delays, which, in turn, lead to increased costs.

“On behalf of our five million members, the National Rifle Association thanks House Armed Services Ranking Member Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) and Senate Armed Services Ranking Member Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) for their tireless efforts to remove these provisions from NDAA,” said NRA-ILA Executive Director, Jason Ouimet. “The due process and Second Amendment rights of our men and women in uniform should never be compromised.”

As dutiful defenders of the Second Amendment, this is just one more example of why freedom-loving Americans must always be diligent, so as not to see our rights eroded by anti-gun legislators.

Latest

2079482659 284Be583b8 K
2079482659 284Be583b8 K

A Win for the Second Amendment in California

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently rejected California’s request to reconsider a case that challenged the Golden State’s overreach.

Shooting Straight with Jennifer Grossman

As the head of a non-profit that places the promotion of liberty at its core, Jennifer A. Grossman is part of the cultural struggle to keep our individual rights.

How is American Freedom Too Sensitive for Public Spaces?

Politicians supporting overly broad “sensitive-place” restrictions, and similar measures, are not making good-faith arguments. Rather, this is the latest ploy being used by gun-controllers in their pursuit of power.

Who Is The American Gun Owner? All Of US!

Many in the mainstream media and in Hollywood have long painted an unfavorable portrait of the American gun owner. Reality, however, paints a far different picture.

Fear and Loathing of Gaston Glock

With the passing of Gaston Glock, it is time to remember that the innovative design of the Glock 17 whipped gun controllers into a frenzy.

The Armed Citizen® February 23, 2024

True stories of the right to keep and bear arms.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.