NDAA Passes Senate Without Anti-Gun Provisions

by
posted on December 18, 2021
remote.jpeg

In another example of why we must stay ever-vigilant, the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) nearly had a pair of anti-gun provisions included in it. These were omitted from the final, recently approved version thanks to the diligent work of pro-Second Amendment legislators and the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (ILA).

This annual, bipartisan legislation directs the funding for our military and national-security programs. That two anti-gun provisions were forced into the House-passed version of the NDAA illustrates why we must always be prepared to fight back against those who wish to curtail our freedoms. 

The first of the pair, spearheaded by Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.), would have allowed for the confiscation of personally-owned firearms, without due process, for military members. “This would have represented a clear denial of constitutional due process and a stunning betrayal of those who swore an oath to protect and defend our country and the U.S. Constitution,” reported NRA-ILA.

The other provision was an amendment from Rep. Norma Torres (D-Calif.) that would have changed regulations crafted by the Trump administration. These regulations were designed to enhance the competitiveness of American companies in the firearms and ammunition sectors, while simultaneously removing burdens on gunsmiths and other small businesses. They also modernize export controls and enhance national security.

Instead, Torres’ proposed amendment would have given power to anti-Second Amendment lawmakers in what is normally an administrative exercise. This would lead to numerous, unnecessary delays, which, in turn, lead to increased costs.

“On behalf of our five million members, the National Rifle Association thanks House Armed Services Ranking Member Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) and Senate Armed Services Ranking Member Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) for their tireless efforts to remove these provisions from NDAA,” said NRA-ILA Executive Director, Jason Ouimet. “The due process and Second Amendment rights of our men and women in uniform should never be compromised.”

As dutiful defenders of the Second Amendment, this is just one more example of why freedom-loving Americans must always be diligent, so as not to see our rights eroded by anti-gun legislators.

Latest

48548467152_39f9eaba7f_k.jpg
48548467152_39f9eaba7f_k.jpg

Gun-Control Groups Present a Demand List to Biden

A long list of gun-control groups recently signed a letter telling President Biden that his gun-control actions are not enough. In his upcoming State of the Union Address, they want him to agree to much more.

Gun Skills: Shooting from Retreat

Shooting at a stationary target doesn't represent a defensive situation; it's important to "get off the X." But even when we do, we often forget rearward motion as an option.

Gun Review: Springfield Armory DS Prodigy

The DS Prodigy provides the same magazine capacity as most striker-fired polymer pistols; however, it also provides the familiarity–and much-better trigger–of the 1911.

Gun Owners Aren't to Blame For Surging Violent Crime

Increases in violent crime are the result of a number of factors, yet some politicians and media members are blaming lawful gun owners. Here is why.

NRA-Backed Constitutional Carry Introduced in Florida

Another state looks to advance freedom for its citizens.

Confiscation in Canada

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's authoritarian zeal to disarm his citizens is a warning to any free people–and it shows how fundamentally important our constitutional protections are.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.