
I am reporting this from Taipei, Taiwan, and all around this island the shadow of a possible Chinese invasion feels ever more possible. Taiwan is a democratic, strategically vital island that, in a sense, faces a dire security contradiction. It boasts a highly trained military, compulsory male conscription and a population known for its resilience and tech-savviness. But it is missing one vital piece of the national defense puzzle: an armed citizenry.
Taiwan is now trying to build up its civilian readiness. Yet despite a surge in interest in urban warfare training and emergency medical courses among civilians, the Taiwanese government remains stubbornly attached to one of the strictest gun-control regimes in the world.
China’s ambitions toward Taiwan are no secret. China has expanded its naval forces, ramped up air and sea incursions around Taiwan’s perimeter and employed disinformation campaigns to destabilize Taiwanese morale.
Taiwan, to its credit, has not stood still. But one thing hasn’t changed: almost no one in Taiwan can legally own a gun.
The Rifle That Isn’t Behind Every Blade of Grass
Taiwan’s gun laws make those of New York City look lax. Outside of tightly restricted exceptions for law enforcement, indigenous hunters using archaic muzzleloaders and rare cases of civilian sport shooters under heavy regulation, gun ownership is simply off the table.
That’s not to say the Taiwanese haven’t tried to change this. For more than 15 years, lawmakers and citizens alike have called for revisiting these laws in the name of national security.
For one, the Taiwan Defensive Firearms Association (TDFA) is the most-vocal advocate for expanding civilian gun rights. Founded in 2010, the group pushes for legal reforms to allow qualified citizens to own firearms for self-defense and seeks to advance its goals through democratic mechanisms like public referendums. While their influence remains limited due to Taiwan’s strong public and legislative opposition to firearms, these groups continue to press for change, citing national security and personal defense.
And, on the lawmaking side, the political appetite for civilian gun ownership is minimal. Instead, the legislature has doubled down, increasing penalties for firearm possession and public discharge—even for non-functional replicas.
Contrast this with the U.S., where the Second Amendment ensures that private citizens can play a meaningful role in their defense and, by extension, in the republic’s defense. During the American Revolution and again in World War II, citizen-soldiers were there to repel tyranny. Even today, pro-gun advocates often cite the idea of a “rifle behind every blade of grass” as a deterrent against foreign occupation. In Taiwan, all the people have to defend themselves with are basically those blades of grass.
A Legal Loophole That Isn’t
Interestingly, Taiwan technically has a “shall-issue” provision in its gun laws—meaning that, on paper, citizens could apply for a license to own firearms, and as long as they pass a background check and satisfy an “inspection” requirement (presumably of the home), a “gun license shall be granted within 1 month… .” But in practice, the bureaucracy doesn’t issue them. Government offices generally don’t even distribute the application unless you’re a diplomat or a well-connected individual. One citizen sued to access this legal option, and the case went nowhere.
This legal sleight of hand leaves Taiwan with a fragile illusion of security. Criminals and underground markets still manage to access firearms—just like in any gun-controlled society. The only people truly disarmed are law-abiding citizens who might otherwise be Taiwan’s last line of defense in the event of invasion.
America’s Second Amendment is often misunderstood abroad, but its relevance could not be more apparent in Taiwan’s situation. Gun rights are not about crime or sport shooting—they are about the fundamental human right to defend one’s home, one’s community and one’s freedom.
Taiwan has passion and the people. What it lacks is the legal will to arm its citizens.