California Appeals Court Allows Lawsuit Against “Microstamping” Law

posted on December 3, 2016

California’s 5th District Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that firearm manufacturers have the right to present evidence arguing that the technology doesn’t currently exist to comply with a California law requiring “microstamping” technology in new models of semi-automatic handguns, the San Jose Mercury News reports. 

Sending the case back to the lower court—which had earlier dismissed the suit—for further consideration, the appeals court in effect sided with firearm manufacturers. 

In their lawsuit, manufacturers argued that California’s law—which requires new models of semi-automatic handguns to incorporate technology that marks every cartridge case in two places with the firearm’s make, model and serial number—is impossible to comply with. 

The appeals court seemed to agree. As Justice Herbert Levy wrote for the court, “It would be illogical to uphold a requirement [of the California law] that is currently impossible to accomplish.”

Latest

AP930691352982
AP930691352982

The Real Data on Violent-Crime Rates

While much of the mainstream media are quick to prop up President Joe Biden’s (D) failed administration with reports that violent crime is falling dramatically in the United States, a new analysis by the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) proves those reports to be untrue.

The Armed Citizen® April 26, 2024

True stories of the right to keep and bear arms.

Shooting Straight With Robert J. Cottrol

Robert J. Cottrol, a law and history professor, noticed that a lot of Americans need to better understand the Second Amendment. He decided to do something about it.

SCOTUS to Hear Another Second Amendment Case

The U.S. Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear a case that challenges the ATF’s so-called “ghost gun” rule later this year.

Trump Promises to Protect the Second Amendment

With a full arena watching at the NRA Great American Outdoor Show, Trump was met with repeated cheers. Here is what he had to say.

Hawaiian Judges Thinks the “Spirit of Aloha” Invalidates Our Rights

These Hawaiian judges decided that the words plainly written in the state’s constitution don’t actually mean what they say.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.