At Least Politicians Are Telling Us What They Really Think

by
posted on September 25, 2019
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
polititians.jpg

The good thing about social media is it allows people to air their opinions publicly and immediately with no filter. The bad thing about social media is that it allows people to air their opinions publicly and immediately with no filter.

Traditionally, politicians’ statements have been painstakingly massaged, filtered and spun until just the right phraseology, verified through polling data, is released to the public. Thanks to social media, candidates now can vent streams of consciousness without all that overhead. The direct nature of social-media communication gives voters unprecedented insight into what candidates actually think.

Now that a presidential election is on the horizon, a score of Democratic candidates are vying for Air Force One passes and giving us a sea change in messaging. Long gone are the days when a pandering politician dropped by the local Walmart to buy blaze orange for a photo-op pheasant hunt. The vote tabulation calculus has changed. While primaries are notorious for swinging far left or right of general election positioning, this one is characterized by candidates desperately trying to outflank each other to the left on gun issues. Even those with historically tepid public positions on gun control are saying some outrageous things.

Perusing the social-media accounts of those deemed most likely to earn the Democrat Party nomination, we see a handful of gun-issue positioning categories, but there is one overriding theme: a need for “common-sense” solutions. Not surprisingly, those proposed solutions include only gun-rights restrictions for law-abiding citizens.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) tweeted: “Republicans won’t act-because gun lobbyists are signing their checks.” She’s not the only one making such baseless accusations. Bernie Sanders said, “After every tragedy the Senate, intimidated by the NRA’s power, does nothing. This must change.”

This Twitter rant is from former gun-rights proponent Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.): “The NRA is lying to the American people. The chokehold they have on our laws is not about the Second Amendment. It is about gun sales. It is about greed and corruption. It is about making sure the status quo—thousands dying every year—stays the same.” It gets worse. “The NRA and the gun industry just want to protect their profits—it is all about money and greed. They want to keep selling weapons of war to anyone willing to pay, no matter how unsafe it makes the rest of us. It has nothing to do with protecting the Second Amendment.”

Mayor Pete Buttigieg is also all in: “We are under attack by white nationalist terrorists, abetted by weak gun laws and the @NRA.”

Bolstered by the perception of broad support, all the Democratic presidential contenders call for “universal” background checks and closing of the so-called “gun-show loophole.” Joe Biden summed up the other candidates’ positions this way: “@senatemajldr Mitch McConnell should reconvene the Senate and pass the House’s universal background check bill. We cannot wait to take action.”

At least one candidate is clear about what background checks mean. Senator and presidential candidate Cory Booker (D-N.J.) wants to implement a national licensing program. Booker said, “We can save lives by implementing commonsense measures like my proposal for gun licensing—because if you need a license to drive a car, you should need one to own a gun.” (Will he ever learn the difference between a legal right, as the Second Amendment protects, and a privilege?)

One candidate leads them all with calls for bans on modern sporting rifles, at least in terms of the longevity of his political career. Bernie Sanders first called for an “assault weapons” ban back in 1988 and continues today with statements like: “You should not be able to walk into a store and purchase assault weapons. These type [sic] of weapons should be banned.”

Other candidates jumped on that bandwagon long ago, but the frequency of the disinformation has ramped up. Kamala Harris, for example, said, “Assault weapons are weapons of war. They are designed to kill a lot of people quickly. There is no reason they should exist on the streets of a civil society.”

In repeated social-media posts, Harris promises to act even if Congress doesn’t. Recent tweets include: “Congress must have the courage to pass reasonable gun safety laws. If they won’t act, I will” and “as president, I’ll take executive action to ban imports of AR-15-style assault weapons.” (Let’s not to tell her that most modern sporting rifles are made right here in the USA.)

Consistent with the rash nature of Twitter and Facebook posts, most Democratic candidates don’t hide their low opinion of law-abiding gun owners and NRA members. In the words of South Bend, Ind., Mayor and presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg: “It’s one thing to own a gun. It’s another thing to worship it, like a false God, believing it will make you a better man.”

No Buttigieg, not better, just safer and freer.

Latest

House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith
House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith

The Greatest Second Amendment Victory in a Century

On July 4, 2025, Americans celebrated not only our nation’s independence, but also the restoration of our constitutional Second Amendment rights becoming unconstrained by burdensome and arbitrary fees.

Opening Salvo | More Evidence That Gun-Control Groups are Freaking Out

With the Trump administration’s law-and-order push showing America’s crime problem is clearly not the fault of lawfully armed citizens, gun-control groups are freaking out.

John Rich has a Song for Armed Citizens

John Rich's latest song is "The Righteous Hunter." It is a moving tune about standing up to stop those with evil intentions. It is a song for lawfully armed citizens.

This Department of Education Grant Could Change Things

The University of Wyoming’s Firearms Research Center has been awarded a nearly $1 million grant by the U.S. Department of Education to develop a nationwide program on the origins, meaning and implications of the Second Amendment.

From the Editor | Charlie Kirk Lived for Freedom

“Give me liberty, or give me death,” are the immortal words of Patrick Henry spoken on March 23, 1775, to the Second Virginia Convention in Richmond, Va. His impassioned words were a call to arms against British tyranny.  

Ninth Circuit to Revisit Background Checks on Ammo Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted rehearing en banc in Rhode v. Bonta—a case backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle and Pistol Association. 

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.