Biden Wants to Make “Smart Guns” Mandatory (Whether They Exist or Not!)

by
posted on August 17, 2020
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
smartsystem_ip1-pistole_2.jpg

Within the “Gun Safety” section of Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign website, Biden states that if elected he would: “Put America on the path to ensuring that 100% of firearms sold in America are smart guns.”

So Biden, the Democratic Party’s presumptive 2020 nominee for president, is vowing in print to do all he can to institute a plan to make so-called “smart guns” the only choice for American gun owners. If he is elected to be the 46th President of the United States, that is. 

The “smart-gun” theory, frequently bandied around by gun-control advocates, is that such high-tech firearms could only be used by specific people. This would mean, these advocates would have you believe, that unauthorized individuals wouldn’t be able to pick up and fire such guns.

While that science-fiction argument has some theoretical merits, it is also impractical, expensive, foolhardy, unrealistic and it invites authoritarian-style control. But let’s just start with the fact that actual, working smart-guns do not exist.

Biden, and gun-control activists, don’t care that these guns don’t exist; actually, that’s fine with them. When pressed, however, Biden claims the current lack of these smart guns isn’t due to various technological shortfalls. No, the reason these guns are not available today, he says, is because of NRA “bullying.”

The truth is irrelevant to Biden. He doesn’t feel he even has to acknowledge that the NRA is simply opposed to “smart” gun mandates, not the actual technology. The NRA has said officially: “The NRA doesn’t oppose the development of ‘smart’ guns, nor the ability of Americans to voluntarily acquire them. However, NRA opposes any law prohibiting Americans from acquiring or possessing firearms that don’t possess ‘smart’ gun technology.”

The NRA has also noted: “Gun-control supporters advocate laws to prohibit the sale of firearms that do not possess ‘smart’ technology, as a way to prohibit the manufacture of traditional handguns, raise the price of handguns that would be allowed to be sold and, presumably, to imbed into handguns a device that would allow guns to be disabled remotely.”

The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), the trade organization for the firearms industry, doesn’t oppose the idea of smart guns, either. But, as the group has repeatedly pointed out, while Biden and others have breathlessly touted so-called “smart guns,” once again the technology simply doesn’t exist.

As NSSF has noted, millions and millions of dollars have been spent to develop this potential technology, including $12.6 million in dedicated federal funding by the U.S. Justice Department. To date, it’s all still in the prototype stage.

Every one of the prototypes the NSSF is aware of uses batteries. According to NSSF, “What is the default mode for the product when the battery fails? Does it default to a mode where the firearm cannot function at a time when the owner needs to use the firearm to save his or her life? Does it default to a mode where it can fire, creating the potential for an irresponsible owner leaving a loaded firearm accessible to an unauthorized user, such as a child, because the owner relied upon the technology that has failed?”

High-tech doesn’t come free or cheap, either. If they are available one day, expect “smart guns” to cost considerably more than traditional guns. And if these more-expensive firearms were made mandatory, no doubt many Americans would be priced out of the ability to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

Biden isn’t interested in reality or our rights; he is just interested in control. To this effect, Biden has even claimed that firearms can be made “smart” to a person’s DNA!

During the Democratic Presidential Primary debates, Biden said, “If I get elected president of the United States of America with your help, if that happens, guns, we have the capacity now in a James Bond-style to make sure no one can pull a trigger unless their DNA and fingerprint is on it. We have that capacity to do it now. You know it.”

Well, we do know that fingerprint-identification technology does exist; however, we don’t know anyone who has a “smart gun” equipped with DNA identification capabilities. Except maybe James Bond?

We also do know that a Biden administration would use every real or theoretical means it could dream up to take away Americans’ Second Amendment rights.

Latest

17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg
17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg

Another Example of What Actual Free Speech Does for the Second Amendment

This is the sort of truth bombing X can now give us—thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social-media site—if we are discerning about who we follow and take the time to be cautious about what we believe.

Hawaii Wants to Go Further Than Mere “Aloha Spirit” in Defiance of Citizens’ Rights

Within weeks of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, Hawaii lawmakers are moving on legislation to find other ways to keep citizens’ Second Amendment rights effectively off-limits.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

In a poignant rebuke of the Massachusetts handgun roster, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Granata v. Campbell.

Armed Citizen Interview: NYC Homeowner

Moshe Borukh heard glass breaking downstairs in his Jamaica Estates home in Queens, N.Y., around 2:40 a.m. Borukh grabbed his pistol and investigated. He soon discovered that a man was inside his home.

Why Did This NFL Offensive Tackle Get Arrested in NYC?

Rasheed Walker thought he was following the law when he declared he had an unloaded Glock 9 mm pistol in a locked case to a Delta Air Lines employee at LaGuardia Airport in New York City on January 23.

The NRA Weighs in on “Unlawful Users”

With the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled to hear United States v. Hemani on March 2, the NRA, along with the Independence Institute and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.