California Did What?

by
posted on February 21, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
California flag
(Eric Chan via Flickr)

In January, California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) proclaimed his support for Mexico’s position in the ongoing case Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc, et al. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos. This case is due to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in early March. This suit is an attempt by the Mexican government, working with U.S.-based gun-control advocates, to undo the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), to use the U.S. firearms industry as a scapegoat for Mexican lawlessness and to impose billions of dollars in liability on American gun manufacturers for violence perpetrated by criminals south of the border.

The PLCAA merely prohibits lawsuits against the gun industry for the criminal misuse of its products by a third party. Suits against the industry for knowingly unlawful sales, negligent entrustment and those predicated on traditional product-liability grounds are still permitted.

“While California’s assistance to Mexico may surprise some, the attempt to undermine Americans’ Second Amendment rights shouldn’t. In 2021, California joined an amicus curiae brief supporting New York’s position in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, in which the Supreme Court made clear that the Second Amendment protects the right to carry a firearm outside the home for self-defense,” reported the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (ILA).

“Those seeking a robust defense of the PLCAA and America’s Second Amendment tradition, and a repudiation of Mexico and its collaborators’ arguments, are encouraged to read NRA’s amicus curiae brief to the U.S. Supreme Court here. Oral arguments before the Court have been set for March 4.”

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.