Cornell Law School: Individual Right To Bear Arms Originated In 2008

posted on May 29, 2015
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **

“The Second Amendment has most recently been interpreted to grant the right of gun ownership to individuals for purposes that include self-defense.”—Cornell Law School webpage

Whoever wrote the preceding may need to hit the books a bit harder if they believe an individual right to bear arms is a “recent interpretation.” They could start with U.S. v. Emerson (2001): “We have found no historical evidence that the Second Amendment … applies only to members of a select militia … the Second Amendment applies to and protects individual Americans.” The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (2005), the Firearm Owners Protection Act (1986), the Property Requisition Act (1941) and the Freedmen’s Bureau Act (1866) likewise recognize individual Second Amendment rights. 

In fact, the individual right to self-defense being enumerated as law pre-dates our Bill of Rights by at least 100 years—meaning Cornell missed the mark by only about three centuries.

Latest

President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump

This Way To FREEDOM

As we are caught in the throes of this moment in American history, the things we should be seeing are going by blurry fast or are being ignored altogether by a mainstream media that feeds on the partisan din.

The Trade Association for the Firearms Industry is Calling Out JPMorganChase

The CEO of JPMorganChase, Jamie Dimon, went on Fox News and claimed that JPMorganChase does not debank individuals, associations or corporations for ideological reasons. But the NSSF points out that Dimon has said different things before.

Gun Review | Rost Martin RM1C

I would like to introduce you to the Rost Martin RM1C—and yes, anyone familiar with the Glock 19 will immediately see its lineage. I nevertheless became intrigued by this gun, as I believe you might, thanks to some of its special features—and thanks to its price tag.

The NRA is Still Fighting for Our First Amendment Freedoms

Though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in favor of the NRA's argument in NRA v. Vullo, the decision sent the case back to a lower court, which ruled the offending government official had "qualified immunity." As a result, this case is ongoing.

Policing Should Not Be A Political Issue

Crime is a complicated topic, but there is an extremely simple rule that must be observed before one can begin to fight it effectively: One must genuinely wish to deal with the problem. Without such an elementary ambition, no amount of legislation, activity, taxpayer money or speechmaking will make the slightest bit of difference.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.