Court Rules For Due Process Over Seized Firearms

posted on July 22, 2017
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **

The U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling this week that a woman whose firearms were seized by law enforcement was entitled to a hearing to have them returned.

Guns.com reports that Christine Panzella of New York had two rifles and three shotguns, along with her pistol license, confiscated by the local sheriff’s office five years ago in response to a temporary protective order filed by her ex-husband. The order expired and the filing was withdrawn, which led to the return of Panzella’s license—but not her firearms. They remain in the armory of the Nassau County Correctional Center.

Panzella filed suit against the sheriff’s office in 2013. The county appealed a district court’s 2015 ruling in favor of Panzella to the 2nd Circuit Court, claiming that she had not been deprived of her right to petition the New York Supreme Court under Article 78 of state law. Circuit Judge Guido Calabresi wrote that an appeal at the county level was preferable: “Such a hearing would provide Panzella with a timely and inexpensive forum to challenge the County’s retention of her long arms and would avoid placing on Panzella the burdens that inhere in an Article 78 proceeding.”

Latest

Holiday Gift Guide

The Trade Association for the Firearms Industry is Calling Out JPMorganChase

The CEO of JPMorganChase, Jamie Dimon, went on Fox News and claimed that JPMorganChase does not debank individuals, associations or corporations for ideological reasons. But the NSSF points out that Dimon has said different things before.

Gun Review | Rost Martin RM1C

I would like to introduce you to the Rost Martin RM1C—and yes, anyone familiar with the Glock 19 will immediately see its lineage. I nevertheless became intrigued by this gun, as I believe you might, thanks to some of its special features—and thanks to its price tag.

The NRA is Still Fighting for Our First Amendment Freedoms

Though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in favor of the NRA's argument in NRA v. Vullo, the decision sent the case back to a lower court, which ruled the offending government official had "qualified immunity." As a result, this case is ongoing.

Policing Should Not Be A Political Issue

Crime is a complicated topic, but there is an extremely simple rule that must be observed before one can begin to fight it effectively: One must genuinely wish to deal with the problem. Without such an elementary ambition, no amount of legislation, activity, taxpayer money or speechmaking will make the slightest bit of difference.

Gun-Control Group Inadvertently Admits Armed Citizens are Effective

The gun-control group Everytown inadvertently admitted that lawfully armed citizens stop a lot of crimes in America.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.