Court Rules That Feelings Justify Gun Bans

posted on April 29, 2015

A federal three-judge panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a ban on so-called "assault weapons" and "large-capacity magazines" in the city of Highland Park, Ill., in part because it unilaterally decided that "[i]f a ban on semi-automatic guns and large-capacity magazines reduces the perceived risk from a mass shooting, and makes the public feel safer as a result, that's a substantial benefit."

In the 2-to-1 decision, Judge Frank Easterbrook held that "... the Constitution establishes a federal republic where local differences are cherished as elements of liberty, rather than eliminated in a search for national uniformity ..."—apparently using that to justify ignoring the Heller and McDonald Supreme Court precedents, ignoring the U.S. Constitution and allowing local jurisdictions to do whatever they want.

The opinion is worthwhile reading—both for the breathtaking ignorance in the majority opinion, and for the dissent's effective demolition of their arguments.

Latest

The Armed Citizen
The Armed Citizen

The Armed Citizen® January 24, 2025

True stories of the right to keep and bear arms

Tim Walz Endorsed Who?

As Tim Walz prepares to head back into obscurity, perhaps he thinks he can help yank this young man out of it.

Snapshots from SHOT Show

The flood of gun innovations being unveiled this week and the very existence of the SHOT SHOW are statements about the resilience of American freedom.

Welcome Back, President Trump

President Trump returns to the White House today in what can only be described as a victory for freedom.

5 Reasons You Shouldn’t Believe Everytown’s State Rankings

Everytown’s annual rankings employ some oddly weight criteria.

The Armed Citizen® January 17, 2025

True stories of the right to keep and bear arms



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.