Democrat Wants “Assault Weapon” Ban, but Won’t Say It

by
posted on July 15, 2018
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
gun-rights.jpg (3)

A New York liberal Democrat got caught employing a stealth tactic during her run for Congress. Tedra Cobb wants a ban on “assault rifles,” but she won’t admit it on the campaign trail because she knows it will cost her at the polls.

Yes, you read that right. After watching Hillary Clinton lose in 2016 and Al Gore lose in 2000, seems like the new generation of liberal Democratic Party politicians are trying a new approach: keep mum about guns until they win, then they’ll restrict the Second Amendment into oblivion.

During a gathering that predated the June primary, Cobb said the following, according to the Albany Times Union:

"When I was at this thing today — it was the first table I was at — a woman said, 'How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb says in a recently released video. "And I said — you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet — and I just said to her, 'I want you to know, Cindy, I cannot say that.'"

She later explained in the tape that she was advised to keep silent about her views on guns by—surprise—Moms Demand Action, which told her that voicing her opinion would hurt her chances at the voting booth.

Moms Demand Action denies giving the advice, and Cobb’s campaign folks gave slippery answers that didn’t address the candidate’s stance on semi-automatic rifles when they were asked about the video. Later, they will probably go on the offensive and say that the video was made without her consent, but any savvy politicians should know that everything they do and say on the trail is subject to being repeated or recorded.

The fact is, guns are a perennial hot topic, and for politicians to purposely hide their views on gun control is irresponsible at best. Cobb also avoided questions about the nation’s most commonly owned rifles in June. When she was asked whether she’d support a federal ban on AR-15s and similar rifles, she replied by talking about how bump stocks should be outlawed and the background check system should be intensified.

As one of her challengers said recently, there’s a reason Moms Demand Action threw their support behind Cobb. Too bad most of the voters won’t know it before Election Day.

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.