Dick’s Destroys AR-15s it Took off the Shelves

by
posted on April 18, 2018
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
destroying-guns.jpg

When Dick’s Sporting Goods said it was going to stop selling so-called “assault weapons” at its Field & Stream stores and require any gun buyer to be at least 21, despite the fact that federal law says 18 is the age for long guns, did it make you wonder how the retailer was going to return all those firearms? Well, no worries on that front now. Seems Dick’s has decided to destroy all the guns instead.

That’s right. The company announced that it would destroy them, and accessories for the guns in question, in accordance with federal guidelines and regulations. No word on how many guns will be destroyed, but Wall Street didn’t take well to the news, with Dick’s losing almost 2 percent in trading on Tuesday.

The rifles will be demolished at various Dick’s distribution centers, after which they’ll be taken to a salvage company for recycling.

About two weeks after the Valentine’s Day shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High in Parkland, Fla., Dick’s was one of the nation’s big retailers (Walmart was another) that arbitrarily decided to enforce its own form of gun control, limiting sales of AR-15 platform guns and raising the buying age for rifles.

Dick’s has faced some blowback, with a couple of discrimination lawsuits pending, and its stock has been trading in the $30-$35 range much of this calendar year.

Dick’s might have thought the gun control moves were in line with public sentiment, but it’s likely to end up costing the company on the bottom line.

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.