Government Agencies Should Not Be Doing This

by
posted on December 22, 2022
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
data
Burak The Weekender/Pexels

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been caught red-handed deleting defensive-gun-use statistics from its website.

In a story broken by Stephen Gutowski at The Reload, a collection of emails accessed through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request showed that gun-control activists worked closely, both face to face and via email, with CDC officials to remove statistics they didn’t like from the CDC’s website. Specifically, they didn’t want people to know about criminologist Gary Kleck’s 1992 study that indicated that Americans use firearms for self-defense up to 2.5 million times a year.

Apparently, the 2.5 million figure was making it more difficult for gun-control advocates to argue that guns are seldom used for self-defense. That prompted Mark Bryant, head of the Gun Violence Archive, and two other gun-ban activists to work with the CDC to seek removal of that figure.

“That 2.5 million number needs to be killed, buried, dug up, killed again and buried again,” Bryant wrote to CDC officials after their meeting. “It is highly misleading, is used out of context and I honestly believe it has zero value—even as an outlier point in honest DGU discussions.”

For his part, Kleck, professor emeritus at Florida State University’s College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, said the CDC did not contact him before removing the figure.

“CDC is just aligning itself with the gun-control advocacy groups,” Kleck told The Reload. “It’s just saying, ‘We are their tool, and we will do their bidding.’ And that’s not what a government agency should do.”

This again proves that the federal government under the Biden administration is working with anti-gun advocates to sway the critical discussion on defensive gun uses toward the anti-Second Amendment point of view. Interestingly, this is not the first time this year that a federal agency has committed such a breach of conduct.

Earlier this year, the FBI grossly underreported the number of times armed citizens had stopped mass murderers over an eight-year period. John Lott, head of the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC), brought that fact to the attention of Congress when he testified before the U.S. House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security.

“The FBI reports that armed citizens stopped only 11 of the 252 active shooter incidents that it identified for the period 2014-2021,” Lott told the members of Congress in attendance. “To compile its list, the FBI hired academics at the Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training Center at Texas State University. Police departments don’t collect data, so the researchers had to find news stories about these incidents.

“The CPRC also undertook a search for news stories,” Lott said. “We discovered a total of 360 active shooter incidents from 2014 to 2021, and found that an armed citizen stopped 124 of these.”

An open and honest discussion, with the best data available there for all to see, is what fosters healthy and productive policy debates. These attempts to control the narrative by eliminating data gun-control groups find inconvenient to their agendas should not be happening in a free country.

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

ATF Pursues Changes to Federal Ban on Unlawful Drug Users/Addicts

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) posted a proposed rule on the Federal Register seeking to redefine what constitutes an unlawful drug user for the purpose of the Gun Control Act.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.