Gun-Store Lockdowns Deemed Unconstitutional

by
posted on January 28, 2022
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
newguns.jpeg

A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that Los Angeles County’s closure of gun stores at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic was unconstitutional.

In the panel’s decision, Judge Andrew Kleinfeld wrote that the Los Angeles County order “severely burdens the core of the Second Amendment right at a time of crisis, precisely when the need to exercise that right becomes most acute.” Judges Ryan Nelson and Lawrence VanDyke concurred with Kleinfeld’s opinion.

Though the stores were only closed for 11 days in Los Angeles, the decision aptly noted that “11 days instantly becomes 21 days when adding California’s 10-day waiting period for acquiring firearms,” before adding that the orders “could be perpetually extended if the County so decided.”

“The court today recognized that Los Angeles County violated Second Amendment rights when it shut down gun stores and ranges in the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. This is an important decision. It ensures that California – or any state – cannot use a crisis to trample on the Constitutional rights of citizens,” said Michael Jean, NRA director of the Office of Litigation Counsel.

The decision from the Ninth Circuit is a welcome one that strikes against overreaching government officials who seek any method possible to curtail our Second Amendment rights. Localities in California weren’t the only ones that attempted to use this dishonest tactic, either.

As we’ve written here at A1F.com, firearms ranges and stores are absolutely essential businesses. “The ‘essential’ nature of the Second Amendment was protected from government infringement when the U.S. Bill of rights was ratified over two centuries ago. This right is fundamental—during local or national emergencies, this right must especially be protected so good citizens can stay safe and secure.”

The Trump administration had issued official guidelines that included gun stores as essential during the early response to the global pandemic: “Workers supporting the operation of firearm or ammunition product manufacturers, retailers, importers, distributors and shooting ranges.”

Nonetheless, anti-gun politicians in many areas sought to curtail the rights of law-abiding citizens by imposing regulations to shut down gun stores and other businesses designated as essential that are involved in Second Amendment-related activities. Fortunately, the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA), along with others in the pro-gun community, challenged the Los Angeles County order—as well as similar overbearing COVID-19 restrictions, including in New Mexico and New York

If these closures had gone unchallenged, then politicians who don’t like American citizens’ Second Amendment rights might use any emergency to further restrict this critical part of our freedom.

Latest

William A. Bachenberg
William A. Bachenberg

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

More than a Quarter Million Suppressor eForms Have Been Processed by the ATF this Month

When the $200 tax stamp on suppressors and other restricted items was set to be zeroed out at midnight on December 31, 2025, last summer, it was a given that demand would explode on January 1, 2026.

Fourth Circuit Reaffirms That the Second Amendment Does Not End at the Storefront Door

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit struck down Maryland’s attempt to impose a sweeping “default ban” on lawful concealed carry on private property open to the public.

The U.S. Supreme Court Hears Wolford v. Lopez

Today (January 20), the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on Hawaii’s ban on carrying guns on private property that is open to the public—at least unless the property owner has given express consent for the carrying of guns.

What the Supreme Court Justices Said About Hawaii’s Carry Restrictions

The U.S. Supreme Court heard Wolford v. Lopez. It is a challenge to Hawaii’s law banning citizens with permits to carry handguns from going armed on any private property in the state unless the property owner has given express permission to do so. Here is what was said.

 



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.