How Innovations from Firearms-Related Companies Impact Our Freedom

by
posted on May 6, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **

In the Heller decision (2008), the U.S. Supreme Court reiterated that the Second Amendment protects the ownership of firearms that are in “common use.” This critically acknowledges that firearms and related products evolve as companies use new technologies, materials and ideas to invent. The Second Amendment, after all, didn’t just protect 18th century firearm technology; it allowed the marketplace to do important research and development and for the citizenry and their local, state and federal government to benefit. The fact that the cutting edge of firearms technology can shoot off in directions old laws never foresaw is inevitable—so, it seems, is the predilection of gun-control types to try to ban anything new.

This brings us to this video interview with the founder and CEO of Sellmark, James Sellers. Like many firearms-related companies, Sellmark’s brands make their reputations with innovation that gun owners want (or, perhaps, didn’t know they wanted until they saw it).

“We started in 2000, so this is our 25th anniversary, but it really wasn’t until 2007, when we launched Sightmark, that we started developing and designing optics. In those early years we felt like—this should resonate with those who understand this freedom—that all the major companies were overly focused on traditional bolt-action hunting rifles,” says Sellers. “The AR-15 wasn’t really getting the attention it deserved yet. I directed the company’s efforts at making the AR-15 as accessible, functional and accurate as possible.

“So, we set out to create the best optics and we really found there is a great opportunity to make red-dot sites that perform at extremely high levels. We had several big innovations, such as advanced optical systems without parallax, and we worked on internal mechanisms to make the adjustments hold better for recoil.

“We now have about 150 patents. I would say that our success really comes from a marketing-discipline background, focusing on what the market needs, telling good brand stories and, of course, creating the best possible products.”

For more, watch this video with founder and CEO of Sellmark, James Sellers.

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.