John Lott Q&A: Debunking Media Spin On Guns And Domestic Violence

by
posted on April 20, 2017
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
17-aff_main_lottdomesticviolence.jpg

When a violent husband barged into a California elementary school last week and killed his wife, a special needs student and himself, the media had a heyday. While most in the “mainstream” press basically ignored the fact that the murder-suicide was in a gun-free zone in the state with the most restrictive gun laws, writers and editors were quick to spout off “research” about domestic violence and guns. 

We took some of those claims to criminologist and researcher John Lott, president of the Crime Prevention Research Center and author of the new book, The War On Guns: Arming Yourself Against Gun Control Lies

A1F Daily: Following last week’s murder-suicide in a San Bernardino school, media outlets were quick to throw around “statistics.” One we saw several times was: “Whenever a gun is present in a domestic violence situation, the chance of a homicide increases.” What does your research show on that topic?

John Lott: The public health research behind this claim is faulty. One big problem is that it ignores the difference between murder and homicides. The difference is a simple one: Homicides include justifiable self-defense cases, but murder does not. To say that homicides rise when there is a presence of a gun thus doesn’t differentiate between whether there is an increase in self-defense or murders. 

Even if the public health research focused on murders instead of homicides, only a tiny percentage of defensive gun uses end in death. Looking only at cases where someone dies misses out on all the defensive gun uses that don’t result in deaths and still protect people. About 90 percent of adult murderers had criminal records as adults.

Nor does the claim attempt to differentiate between whether it’s criminals or law-abiding citizens using guns. About 90 percent of adult murderers had criminal records as adults. The vast majorities of those who kill their domestic partners have a violent criminal history. Men who have a violent criminal record are the real danger for women, and owning a gun is already illegal for those men. Accounting for criminal history would eliminate their finding even with their flawed approach.

A1FD: On the other side of the coin, many gun-rights proponents say those who are the victims of domestic violence need a firearm for protection. What’s your take on that? 

Lott: Guns do make it easier to kill. But there is a simple biological fact that gun control advocates ignore. Men are typically much stronger physically than women, particularly when it comes to upper body strength. Unfortunately, real life isn’t like the movies where one single woman knocks out and overpowers several well-trained men. Men also tend to be faster runners. Even without a gun, men can do a lot of harm to, or even kill, a woman. 

The research in my book More Guns, Less Crime shows that murder rates decline when either more women or more men carry concealed handguns. I found a woman carrying a concealed handgun reduces the murder rate for women by about 3 to 4 times more than a man carrying a concealed handgun reduces the murder rate for men. 

A1FD: CNN reported that 54 percent of all mass shootings involved someone shooting “a current or former intimate partner or family member.” But again, none in “mainstream” media said anything about the school being a gun-free zone. Please remind us what your research has shown on that topic.  

Lott: The media just refuses to mention when mass public shootings occur in gun-free zones, even though that is consistently the easiest part of these attack to report on. Since at least 1950, more than 98 percent of the mass public shootings have taken place where general citizens aren’t allowed to have guns for protection. 

What the media also ignores are the benefits of having a gun for people, particularly those who are weaker physically—women and the elderly.

For additional information dealing with gun control and the Second Amendment, check out John Lott’s newest book, The War On Guns: Arming Yourself Against Gun Control Lies. You can order The War On Guns directly from amazon.com or barnesandnoble.com.

Latest

House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith
House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith

The Greatest Second Amendment Victory in a Century

On July 4, 2025, Americans celebrated not only our nation’s independence, but also the restoration of our constitutional Second Amendment rights becoming unconstrained by burdensome and arbitrary fees.

Opening Salvo | More Evidence That Gun-Control Groups are Freaking Out

With the Trump administration’s law-and-order push showing America’s crime problem is clearly not the fault of lawfully armed citizens, gun-control groups are freaking out.

John Rich has a Song for Armed Citizens

John Rich's latest song is "The Righteous Hunter." It is a moving tune about standing up to stop those with evil intentions. It is a song for lawfully armed citizens.

This Department of Education Grant Could Change Things

The University of Wyoming’s Firearms Research Center has been awarded a nearly $1 million grant by the U.S. Department of Education to develop a nationwide program on the origins, meaning and implications of the Second Amendment.

From the Editor | Charlie Kirk Lived for Freedom

“Give me liberty, or give me death,” are the immortal words of Patrick Henry spoken on March 23, 1775, to the Second Virginia Convention in Richmond, Va. His impassioned words were a call to arms against British tyranny.  

Ninth Circuit to Revisit Background Checks on Ammo Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted rehearing en banc in Rhode v. Bonta—a case backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle and Pistol Association. 

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.