Keene: Executive Order Could Set Gun Owners Back Decades

posted on January 13, 2016
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **

Obama’s executive order expanding background checks incensed many gun owners. But for some, it also inspired a sense of déjà vu, as former NRA President David Keene explained in a Washington Times op-ed.

The passage of the Gun Control Act of 1968 ushered in harsh punishment for those selling guns without a FFL, but didn’t bother to define “dealing.” Federal prosecutors could therefore target “anyone they arbitrarily decided was an illegal gun dealer.” The resultant abuses led to the passage of the Firearms Owners Protection Act, which established our current definition of “dealing.” 

After Obama announced he would redefine “dealer” in order to expand background checks, many believed this meant a yearly limit on private sellers. But with the announcement that a “variety of factors” could result in prosecution—putting anyone who sold one or two firearms a year at risk—we might witness the same blatant and baseless persecution those who came before us fought so hard to end.

Latest

President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump

This Way To FREEDOM

As we are caught in the throes of this moment in American history, the things we should be seeing are going by blurry fast or are being ignored altogether by a mainstream media that feeds on the partisan din.

The Trade Association for the Firearms Industry is Calling Out JPMorganChase

The CEO of JPMorganChase, Jamie Dimon, went on Fox News and claimed that JPMorganChase does not debank individuals, associations or corporations for ideological reasons. But the NSSF points out that Dimon has said different things before.

Gun Review | Rost Martin RM1C

I would like to introduce you to the Rost Martin RM1C—and yes, anyone familiar with the Glock 19 will immediately see its lineage. I nevertheless became intrigued by this gun, as I believe you might, thanks to some of its special features—and thanks to its price tag.

The NRA is Still Fighting for Our First Amendment Freedoms

Though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in favor of the NRA's argument in NRA v. Vullo, the decision sent the case back to a lower court, which ruled the offending government official had "qualified immunity." As a result, this case is ongoing.

Policing Should Not Be A Political Issue

Crime is a complicated topic, but there is an extremely simple rule that must be observed before one can begin to fight it effectively: One must genuinely wish to deal with the problem. Without such an elementary ambition, no amount of legislation, activity, taxpayer money or speechmaking will make the slightest bit of difference.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.