Must-See Interview on Coming Supreme Court Second Amendment Case

by
posted on October 12, 2021
stinchfield.png

With the U.S. Supreme Court poised to render a potential landmark ruling on its first Second Amendment case that deals specifically with firearms in more than a decade, NRA Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) Executive Director Jason Ouimet spoke with Grant Stinchfield on Newsmax about the incredible importance of this case.

The case at hand, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association (NYSRPA) v. Bruen, will be heard on Nov. 3. It deals with a challenge to New York’s onerous restrictions on carrying a firearm for self-defense when outside the home.

When asked just how big the case is, Ouimet said, “Without this, honestly, the Second Amendment might as well be rendered obsolete. This is enormous. Over a decade ago, the Court heard the [District of Columbia v.] Heller decision, right, and said that you had the fundamental individual right to own a firearm in your home for self-defense. This is going to go beyond that. This is going to say whether or not that right ceases at your front door or it’s allowed to exist beyond that.”

He added, “That’s at the very core of the Second Amendment. Shall not be infringed, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed . … That’s the impact that this is going to have.”

Stinchfield made note of how the NRA has worked tirelessly to help enact constitutional carry legislation throughout the country, most recently in Texas. Constitutional Carry, also known as “permitless carry,” operates in stark contrast to New York’s “may-issue” system, which requires people to ask the government permission to exercise their Second Amendment rights. The state thereby treats this right as a legal privilege it can deny or bestow on those they choose.

“We will continue to advance every bit of constitutional carry where we can. We began the year at 16 states having it. We have 21 states that have it now. We’re going to keep on marching,” said Ouimet in response.

NYSRPA v. Bruen could become the first case in which the high court renders a significant ruling involving firearms since 2010, when it affirmed in McDonald v. Chicago that the Second Amendment is a fundamental right that also restricts state and local governments from infringing on this right.

We’ll keep you updated here at A1F.com about how this case develops moving forward.

Latest

4583080594_016e24eb8a_k.jpg
4583080594_016e24eb8a_k.jpg

Here is What the Justices Had to Say About Bump Stocks

The question before the Supreme Court was whether a semi-automatic firearm equipped with a bump stock should be reclassified by the ATF as a machine gun. Here is what they had to say.

The Armed Citizen® March 1, 2024

True stories of the right to keep and bear arms.

Proof That Sen. Schumer Doesn’t Care About Crime

It is telling that anti-Second Amendment legislators spend no time contemplating the actual causes of crime; instead, they are stuck on repeat. It is therefore our job to talk about what really works.

A Win for the Second Amendment in California

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently rejected California’s request to reconsider a case that challenged the Golden State’s overreach.

Shooting Straight with Jennifer Grossman

As the head of a non-profit that places the promotion of liberty at its core, Jennifer A. Grossman is part of the cultural struggle to keep our individual rights.

How is American Freedom Too Sensitive for Public Spaces?

Politicians supporting overly broad “sensitive-place” restrictions, and similar measures, are not making good-faith arguments. Rather, this is the latest ploy being used by gun-controllers in their pursuit of power.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.