NRA In The Courts: NRA-ILA Petitions The U.S. Supreme Court To Hear Challenge To NFA Restrictions On Short-Barreled Rifles

by
posted on August 16, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
Supreme Court building
(NewsBase/AP)

On June 6, the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) filed a petition for certiorari requesting that the U.S. Supreme Court hear a challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934’s restrictions on short-barreled rifles in a case named Rush v. United States.

The NFA imposes tax and registration requirements on any rifle having a barrel shorter than 16 inches. A violation is punishable by up to 10 years’ imprisonment and a fine of up to $250,000, in addition to forfeiture of the rifle. The petition requests that the Supreme Court hear the case and hold the regulations unconstitutional.

“The National Firearms Act imposes burdens on law-abiding gun owners that have no grounding in the text, history or tradition of the Second Amendment,” said Doug Hamlin, NRA executive vice president & CEO. “The Second Amendment guarantees the right of Americans to own commonly used firearms—including short-barreled rifles—without government interference, and we’re hopeful that the Supreme Court will use this opportunity to reaffirm that right.”

The petition emphasizes the confusion among the lower courts over how to adjudicate restrictions on specific categories of arms, including not only short-barreled rifles, but also AR-style rifles and standard-capacity magazines, and the need for the Court to add clarification and to reinforce its precedents. As the petition points out, “the uncertainty throughout the lower courts undermines the Court’s precedents, diminishes the Second Amendment and deprives citizens of their ability to vindicate their constitutional rights.”

The petition proceeds to explain why the NFA’s restrictions on short-barreled rifles violate the Second Amendment under the Supreme Court’s test. Put simply, short-barreled rifles are “arms” covered by the Second Amendment’s plain text, and there is no historical tradition of regulation that supports the registration and taxation of common arms.  

“The NFA’s restrictions on short-barreled rifles have unconstitutionally burdened law-abiding gun owners for far too long,” said John Commerford, NRA-ILA executive director. “The NRA is proud to stand at the forefront of this fight to restore our freedoms and ensure that peaceable citizens are not treated like criminals for owning commonly used firearms.”

Latest

17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg
17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg

Another Example of What Actual Free Speech Does for the Second Amendment

This is the sort of truth bombing X can now give us—thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social-media site—if we are discerning about who we follow and take the time to be cautious about what we believe.

Hawaii Wants to Go Further Than Mere “Aloha Spirit” in Defiance of Citizens’ Rights

Within weeks of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, Hawaii lawmakers are moving on legislation to find other ways to keep citizens’ Second Amendment rights effectively off-limits.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

In a poignant rebuke of the Massachusetts handgun roster, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Granata v. Campbell.

Armed Citizen Interview: NYC Homeowner

Moshe Borukh heard glass breaking downstairs in his Jamaica Estates home in Queens, N.Y., around 2:40 a.m. Borukh grabbed his pistol and investigated. He soon discovered that a man was inside his home.

Why Did This NFL Offensive Tackle Get Arrested in NYC?

Rasheed Walker thought he was following the law when he declared he had an unloaded Glock 9 mm pistol in a locked case to a Delta Air Lines employee at LaGuardia Airport in New York City on January 23.

The NRA Weighs in on “Unlawful Users”

With the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled to hear United States v. Hemani on March 2, the NRA, along with the Independence Institute and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.