NRA Sues Los Angeles City Council For Blacklisting Contractors With NRA Ties

by
posted on June 22, 2019
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
blacklis.jpg

In February, the Los Angeles City Council approved an ordinance that requires companies seeking city contracts to disclose financial ties with the NRA or any of its subsidiaries. In defending the ordinance, council member Mitch O’Farrell went so far as to publicly claim that the “NRA peddles in gun violence and extremism” and is an extremist and white supremacist group that causes incalculable harm.

When the Budget Committee first brought forward the proposed ordinance late last year, the NRA sent a pre-litigation letter to the City Council. Following the ordinance going into effect on April 1 of this year, the NRA filed a lawsuit on April 24.

The NRA accused the city of Los Angeles of violating the First Amendment and silencing the organization’s voice by discriminating against NRA supporters. As NRA-ILA has noted, the city’s ordinance is nothing short of modern-day McCarthyism and is a concern for everyone who values their rights to free speech and association.

“Politicians are free to disagree with the NRA’s pro-freedom, firearm safety and self-reliance message,” said Chuck Michel of Michel & Associates, president of the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA) and civil rights attorney. “They are not free to censor it—as this ordinance would do when NRA supporters drop their NRA affiliations for fear of losing work from the city of Los Angeles because they get put on this ‘blacklist’ with the city of Los Angeles.”

Latest

suppressors.jpeg
suppressors.jpeg

More than a Quarter Million Suppressor eForms Have Been Processed by the ATF this Month

When the $200 tax stamp on suppressors and other restricted items was set to be zeroed out at midnight on December 31, 2025, last summer, it was a given that demand would explode on January 1, 2026.

Fourth Circuit Reaffirms That the Second Amendment Does Not End at the Storefront Door

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit struck down Maryland’s attempt to impose a sweeping “default ban” on lawful concealed carry on private property open to the public.

The U.S. Supreme Court Hears Wolford v. Lopez

Today (January 20), the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on Hawaii’s ban on carrying guns on private property that is open to the public—at least unless the property owner has given express consent for the carrying of guns.

What the Supreme Court Justices Said About Hawaii’s Carry Restrictions

The U.S. Supreme Court heard Wolford v. Lopez. It is a challenge to Hawaii’s law banning citizens with permits to carry handguns from going armed on any private property in the state unless the property owner has given express permission to do so. Here is what was said.

 

Women On Target Program Equips Women

On Sept. 20, 2025, the sound of gunfire carried across the 110-acre grounds of the Arlington-Fairfax Chapter of the Izaak Walton League of America in Fairfax County, Va. But this wasn’t just another day at the range.

North Carolina Vote on Constitutional Carry Delayed Again

The North Carolina House of Representatives rescheduled the veto override vote on Senate Bill 50, or the “Freedom to Carry NC,” to February 9, 2026.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.