Obama Takes One Last Shot At American Gun Owners

by
posted on December 15, 2016
obama-takes-one-last-shot-at-american-gun-owners.jpg

With his time in office quickly winding down, President Barack Obama gave America’s law-abiding gun owners one last poke in the eye on Friday by sending the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) to the U.S. Senate for consideration. 

We’ve been reporting on the Arms Trade Treaty for years (see two examples, here and here, for some background on its dangers). John Kerry signed the ATT on behalf of the Obama administration back in 2013, and it took effect in 2014. But 67 U.S. senators must vote for its ratification—a tall order to fill with the Senate’s current pro-gun landscape.

Upon Kerry’s signing of the treaty, Chris W. Cox, NRA-ILA executive director, issued a dire warning about the consequences if it were ever approved by the U.S. Senate at some time in the future.Since then, the treaty has never been far from the center of NRA’s radar.

“The Obama administration is once again demonstrating its contempt for our fundamental, individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms,” Cox said at the time. “This treaty threatens individual firearm ownership with an invasive registration scheme. The NRA will continue working with the United States Senate to oppose ratification of the ATT.” 

Since then, the treaty has never been far from the center of NRA’s radar. Cox very recently addressed the treaty again in the December 2016 issue of America’s 1st Freedom.

“With the country’s attention focused on the results of the national elections, it is easy to forget about the fight being waged on our Second Amendment-protected rights in the international arena,” Cox said. “While there are numerous initiatives that we continue to monitor internationally, the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) is at the forefront of the NRA’s focus to protect America’s law-abiding gun owners from the continued push for gun control by international anti-gun interests.”

Cox added, “As the NRA predicted, however, the focus of the treaty is now shifting almost exclusively to the domestic civilian trade in firearms. While we expected this shift all along, the move to undermine and attack the Second Amendment-protected rights of ordinary law-abiding Americans came sooner than we could have imagined.”

In a nutshell, the treaty gives gun-ban advocates an opportunity to bypass the Second Amendment’s authority, instead leaving American gun owners subject to the authority of the U.N.—an international body that lacks both accountability and commitment to the natural rights that served as guiding principles for our Founding Fathers. It is already being used as a pretext by many governments to continue eradicating gun ownership by their citizens—thus leaving U.S. firearm freedoms all the more isolated and vulnerable. … in his incredible arrogance, he simply couldn’t resist giving one more middle finger to America’s law-abiding gun owners on his way out.

Additionally, the ATT may directly endanger imports to the United States. At worst, if ratified it could be used as a pretext to impose anti-gun repression within the United States.

And that’s something many in the U.S. Senate will not support.

“Since 2012, many senators, including myself, have expressed opposition to the small arms treaty, citing an array of concerns with Second Amendment rights,” U.S. Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said in a statement released upon learning that Obama had sent the treaty to the Senate. “Nothing has changed over the last four years to suggest the treaty is in our national interest, and it will remain dead in the water. I reiterate my strong opposition and will work with my colleagues to protect the rights of Americans.”

Indeed, it seems unlikely—though certainly not impossible—that the ATT could get the support necessary in the current Senate to ratify the treaty. Same goes for the next legislative session, when Republicans will retain a 52-48 advantage.

Which begs the question: Why would President Obama send the treaty to the Senate for consideration now, when he hasn’t done so over the past three years?

Only the president knows the answer to that. It’s possible that he did it so that later, when he writes his memoirs in an attempt to prop up his failed presidency, he can list the ATT as one more “common-sense” measure he sent to Congress to try to save us all from “gun violence.”

It’s more likely, though, that in his incredible arrogance, he simply couldn’t resist giving one more middle finger to America’s law-abiding gun owners on his way out. And that anti-gun arrogance is something we won’t miss after Jan. 17.

Use Your Power!

National Rifle Association members and other law-abiding gun owners are urged to contact their U.S. senators and ask them to deny Obama’s final anti-gun act by voting against ratification of the ATT. You can contact your senators directly by clicking here.

Latest

AP23336578919908
AP23336578919908

America Loses Its Oldest Factory—Yeah, a Gun Factory

Gone is America’s oldest factory. Silenced are the machines and gone are the jobs for the men and women in a small town in upstate New York.

From The Editor: The Funny Thing About Range Rules

The NRA rules of gun safety begin with three mantras that provide a foundation for all that follows. These very rules also offer a foundation for much more.

Standing Guard | Farewell And Thank You

The NRA isn’t a building in Washington D.C., or anywhere else. It’s an idea, and an ideal, that transcends who we are as individuals. It’s millions of Americans who believe fighting for freedom is the highest calling.

President’s Column | Anti-Gun Politicians Owe Answers

More and more Americans are thankfully embracing their Second Amendment rights. We must embrace them and work together to demand answers of politicians who seek to strip us of this freedom.

Gun Control Targets The Law-Abiding

Gun-control activists often claim that law-abiding gun owners are not the target of their policies, but their rhetoric, actions and more show the contrary.

Hawaii Just Did What?

The Hawaii Supreme Court recently upheld a conviction that directly goes against the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Bruen. The Hawaiian court instead cited this as their rationale for doing so.

 



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.