PolitiFact is Lying About Biden’s Desire to Ban 9 mms

by
posted on September 23, 2021
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
48548467152_39f9eaba7f_k-1.jpeg
Gage Skidmore courtesy Flickr

It is exceptionally irritating when a “fact checker” lies. Especially when this “fact checker” is a company Facebook uses to censor content.

In this case, PolitiFact calls the claim that President Joe Biden (D) wants to ban 9 mm pistols “False.”

PolitiFact calls this claim “false” even though Biden once asked, while campaigning to be president, “Why should we allow people to have military-style weapons including pistols with 9 mm bullets and can hold 10 or more rounds?”

PolitiFact does acknowledge that Biden said this. They still call the claim “false” because they note that he wants to ban “high-capacity” magazines—which Biden defines as those that can hold 10 or more rounds—not necessarily 9 mm pistols.

Talk about a distinction without a difference. Most pistols sold today, whether chambered in 9 mm or for another cartridge, come standard with magazines that hold 10 or more rounds. Also, many of the pistols that don’t come with magazines that can take 10 or more rounds can accept magazines that do hold 10 or more rounds. So Biden’s ban would ban the vast majority of today’s pistols.

To make matters worse, Biden has doubled-down on his stated desire to ban 9 mm pistols, with no update from PolitiFact.

During a July 21 CNN “presidential town hall,” Biden stated, “The idea you need a weapon that can have the ability to fire 20, 30, 40, 50, 120 shots from that weapon, whether -- whether it’s a 9-millimeter pistol or whether it’s a rifle, is ridiculous. I’m continuing to push to eliminate the sale of those things.”

Again, all semi-automatics that are designed to accept a detachable magazine have the “ability to fire” whatever number of rounds a magazine may hold. If Biden wishes to ban all firearms with the “ability” to do so, he must ban all firearms that accept a detachable magazine. Simply banning magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition, as PolitiFact claims is “all” Biden wants to do, will not remove the “ability” to fire more than 10 rounds before reloading. Thus, to achieve his stated goal, he must ban the firearms themselves.

PolitiFact’s “fact checkers” must know that evasion of the truth is a form of lying.

Still, they actually call the NRA’s clear point that Biden said he wants to ban 9 mm pistols “False.”

PolitiFact is being more than misleading here. They are standing there in plain view of the facts and yelling “liar” at those who are pointing out the obvious truth.

Latest

House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith
House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith

The Greatest Second Amendment Victory in a Century

On July 4, 2025, Americans celebrated not only our nation’s independence, but also the restoration of our constitutional Second Amendment rights becoming unconstrained by burdensome and arbitrary fees.

Opening Salvo | More Evidence That Gun-Control Groups are Freaking Out

With the Trump administration’s law-and-order push showing America’s crime problem is clearly not the fault of lawfully armed citizens, gun-control groups are freaking out.

John Rich has a Song for Armed Citizens

John Rich's latest song is "The Righteous Hunter." It is a moving tune about standing up to stop those with evil intentions. It is a song for lawfully armed citizens.

This Department of Education Grant Could Change Things

The University of Wyoming’s Firearms Research Center has been awarded a nearly $1 million grant by the U.S. Department of Education to develop a nationwide program on the origins, meaning and implications of the Second Amendment.

From the Editor | Charlie Kirk Lived for Freedom

“Give me liberty, or give me death,” are the immortal words of Patrick Henry spoken on March 23, 1775, to the Second Virginia Convention in Richmond, Va. His impassioned words were a call to arms against British tyranny.  

Ninth Circuit to Revisit Background Checks on Ammo Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted rehearing en banc in Rhode v. Bonta—a case backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle and Pistol Association. 

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.