PolitiFact is Lying About Biden’s Desire to Ban 9 mms

by
posted on September 23, 2021
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
48548467152_39f9eaba7f_k-1.jpeg
Gage Skidmore courtesy Flickr

It is exceptionally irritating when a “fact checker” lies. Especially when this “fact checker” is a company Facebook uses to censor content.

In this case, PolitiFact calls the claim that President Joe Biden (D) wants to ban 9 mm pistols “False.”

PolitiFact calls this claim “false” even though Biden once asked, while campaigning to be president, “Why should we allow people to have military-style weapons including pistols with 9 mm bullets and can hold 10 or more rounds?”

PolitiFact does acknowledge that Biden said this. They still call the claim “false” because they note that he wants to ban “high-capacity” magazines—which Biden defines as those that can hold 10 or more rounds—not necessarily 9 mm pistols.

Talk about a distinction without a difference. Most pistols sold today, whether chambered in 9 mm or for another cartridge, come standard with magazines that hold 10 or more rounds. Also, many of the pistols that don’t come with magazines that can take 10 or more rounds can accept magazines that do hold 10 or more rounds. So Biden’s ban would ban the vast majority of today’s pistols.

To make matters worse, Biden has doubled-down on his stated desire to ban 9 mm pistols, with no update from PolitiFact.

During a July 21 CNN “presidential town hall,” Biden stated, “The idea you need a weapon that can have the ability to fire 20, 30, 40, 50, 120 shots from that weapon, whether -- whether it’s a 9-millimeter pistol or whether it’s a rifle, is ridiculous. I’m continuing to push to eliminate the sale of those things.”

Again, all semi-automatics that are designed to accept a detachable magazine have the “ability to fire” whatever number of rounds a magazine may hold. If Biden wishes to ban all firearms with the “ability” to do so, he must ban all firearms that accept a detachable magazine. Simply banning magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition, as PolitiFact claims is “all” Biden wants to do, will not remove the “ability” to fire more than 10 rounds before reloading. Thus, to achieve his stated goal, he must ban the firearms themselves.

PolitiFact’s “fact checkers” must know that evasion of the truth is a form of lying.

Still, they actually call the NRA’s clear point that Biden said he wants to ban 9 mm pistols “False.”

PolitiFact is being more than misleading here. They are standing there in plain view of the facts and yelling “liar” at those who are pointing out the obvious truth.

Latest

The Armed Citizen
The Armed Citizen

The Armed Citizen® January 21, 2026

Around 7 a.m. on Nov. 7, 2025, near Los Angeles, a 79-year-old Vietnam War veteran heard his duplex tenant screaming. He found a naked 30-year-old man had forced his way into the woman’s home.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division is Hiring Second Amendment Attorneys

After Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Civil Rights Division, was a guest on Gun Talk Media with Tom Gresham, NRA-ILA reported that Dhillon is “embracing a new style of litigation on behalf of the Second Amendment.”

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.