Promoting Small Business While Trying To Kill The Firearm Industry

by
posted on June 17, 2016
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
9_aff_feature_bloombergbuffet-3.jpg
Jemal Countess/GettyImages

A group of billionaires and elitists that includes Michael Bloomberg and Warren Buffett recently penned an editorial in USA Today opining that the best way to grow the economy is to grow small businesses.

“Helping them expand—to get their ideas off the ground—is one of the best ways to support economic growth,” the op-ed read. 

Now don’t get the wrong idea here: We also support growth of America’s small businesses. What we don’t agree with, however, is the hypocrisy involved with how these billionaire gun-banners’ anti-gun schemes, if implemented, would result in the ruin of many small businesses.

You see, for more than a decade, Bloomberg has been throwing his money against the firearm industry, hoping to shut it—and every small-business owner inside of it—down. So while he may lend his name to a letter that proclaims “we must do more to help small businesses drive a new generation of growth” … rest assured he means elitist-approved, liberal-endorsed businesses only.

Aside from Bloomberg’s millions upon millions of dollars being spent on various gun-ban schemes throughout the country, his support of efforts to wipe out gun-related businesses—both large and small—are obvious. Bloomberg bankrolls the grossly misnamed anti-gun group Everytown for Gun Safety. Buffett sits on the group’s board of directors. And Bloomberg, Buffett and Everytown—along with their chosen presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton—all support repealing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), a move that would effectively wipe out the gun industry, taking related small business right down with it.Clinton, Bloomberg and Buffett all know that. Yet they all support killing the firearm industry by a “death of a thousand cuts.”

Clinton’s campaign website proudly proclaims, “Hillary will lead the charge to repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act”—a law passed by Congress to stop the tidal wave of politically motivated lawsuits that threatened to drive American gunmakers, wholesalers and retailers to bankruptcy, even if they didn’t lose a single case in court. 

At every opportunity on the campaign trail, Clinton brings up the issue again and again. And, as usual, Clinton lies about the entire issue.

First of all, the law doesn’t protect “negligent manufacturers and dealers.” And Clinton’s claim that the firearm industry is “wholly protected from any kind of liability” is a lie—and Clinton knows it.

A dealer who sells a gun to someone he or she knows is a prohibited person—or even suspects that the person will use it to commit a crime—is not only still negligent, and thus not protected from lawsuits, but is also subject to felony prosecution under federal law.

The PLCAA didn’t change anything in such situations.

Clinton, Bloomberg and Buffett all know that. Yet they all support killing the firearm industry by a “death of a thousand cuts.” If successful, the bankruptcy of gun manufacturers would lead to a trickle-down of business deaths, from ammo manufacturers, to gun retailers, to small businesses that sell everything from magazines to scopes and rifle slings, to those who run gun ranges or conduct gun-safety classes.

Just how big of a deal would that be to the American economy? Consider that the most recent figures from the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) reveal that the firearm industry has an annual economic impact of some $49.3 billion—much of that through the small firearm-related business Bloomberg and Clinton hate. The industry also employs nearly 288,000 Americans and pays some $14 billion in wages—nothing to sneeze at, for sure.

The industry also contributes greatly to America’s tax base, contributing some $6.2 billion in business taxes and nearly $677 million in excise taxes.

In truth, these gun-ban billionaires don’t give a darn about any small business that doesn’t agree with their liberal political philosophy—and that means all of those involved in the firearm industry and related businesses. And that fact, combined with the op-ed calling for growing small business, reveals them to be among the world’s biggest hypocrites.

Latest

Holiday Gift Guide

The Trade Association for the Firearms Industry is Calling Out JPMorganChase

The CEO of JPMorganChase, Jamie Dimon, went on Fox News and claimed that JPMorganChase does not debank individuals, associations or corporations for ideological reasons. But the NSSF points out that Dimon has said different things before.

Gun Review | Rost Martin RM1C

I would like to introduce you to the Rost Martin RM1C—and yes, anyone familiar with the Glock 19 will immediately see its lineage. I nevertheless became intrigued by this gun, as I believe you might, thanks to some of its special features—and thanks to its price tag.

The NRA is Still Fighting for Our First Amendment Freedoms

Though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in favor of the NRA's argument in NRA v. Vullo, the decision sent the case back to a lower court, which ruled the offending government official had "qualified immunity." As a result, this case is ongoing.

Policing Should Not Be A Political Issue

Crime is a complicated topic, but there is an extremely simple rule that must be observed before one can begin to fight it effectively: One must genuinely wish to deal with the problem. Without such an elementary ambition, no amount of legislation, activity, taxpayer money or speechmaking will make the slightest bit of difference.

Gun-Control Group Inadvertently Admits Armed Citizens are Effective

The gun-control group Everytown inadvertently admitted that lawfully armed citizens stop a lot of crimes in America.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.