Rep. Pelosi Wants to Punish Law-Abiding Gun Owners

by
posted on June 15, 2022
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
Nancy Pelosi
LBJ Library courtesy Flickr

The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed two gun-control bills that would punish law-abiding gun owners.

The first, H.R. 7910, was introduced by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and rushed to the House floor. The anti-gun bill would “ban law-abiding 18-20-year-old adults from acquiring semi-automatic rifles and shotguns. This unconstitutional legislation would extinguish law-abiding adults’ Second Amendment rights and contends that these individuals are responsible enough to defend their country or vote in an election, but cannot be trusted to follow the law,” reported the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (ILA).

This, however, is far from the only provision that lies within the bill. It would also generally ban standard-capacity magazines, which are commonly owned and often politically mislabeled as “high-capacity.” Amongst the bill’s other provisions is a prohibition on the building of personal firearms, a tradition older than this very nation, and “safe storage” mandates that are in direct conflict with the D.C. v. Heller (2008) decision.

The House also passed a second bill, H.R. 2377. Essentially, it is a combination of legislative proposals to create “red-flag” laws, which allow for the confiscation of law-abiding citizens’ firearms without due process.

“H.R. 2377 would strip Second Amendment rights of individuals by confiscating firearms without constitutional due process by allowing courts to issue ex parte (meaning the accused is not present) firearm confiscation orders. A person could be forcibly disarmed of otherwise lawfully-possessed firearms before he or she had so much as an opportunity to contest the accusations—this would represent a clear denial of constitutional due process protections,” reported NRA-ILA.

Moreover, this opens the door for indefinite firearms seizures and sets no time limits for a law-abiding citizen to be able to once again exercise their Second Amendment rights. It blatantly runs counter to both Fifth Amendment due process protections and Second Amendment protections of the right to keep and bear arms.

Latest

Holiday Gift Guide

The Trade Association for the Firearms Industry is Calling Out JPMorganChase

The CEO of JPMorganChase, Jamie Dimon, went on Fox News and claimed that JPMorganChase does not debank individuals, associations or corporations for ideological reasons. But the NSSF points out that Dimon has said different things before.

Gun Review | Rost Martin RM1C

I would like to introduce you to the Rost Martin RM1C—and yes, anyone familiar with the Glock 19 will immediately see its lineage. I nevertheless became intrigued by this gun, as I believe you might, thanks to some of its special features—and thanks to its price tag.

The NRA is Still Fighting for Our First Amendment Freedoms

Though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in favor of the NRA's argument in NRA v. Vullo, the decision sent the case back to a lower court, which ruled the offending government official had "qualified immunity." As a result, this case is ongoing.

Policing Should Not Be A Political Issue

Crime is a complicated topic, but there is an extremely simple rule that must be observed before one can begin to fight it effectively: One must genuinely wish to deal with the problem. Without such an elementary ambition, no amount of legislation, activity, taxpayer money or speechmaking will make the slightest bit of difference.

Gun-Control Group Inadvertently Admits Armed Citizens are Effective

The gun-control group Everytown inadvertently admitted that lawfully armed citizens stop a lot of crimes in America.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.