Rotting At The Center

posted on July 24, 2015
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
ftf-from-print.jpg

The Violence Policy Center recently came out with another of its infamous “studies,” this time allegedly “proving”—by comparing criminal homicides to justifiable homicides—that guns do more harm than good. And again, the group’s so-called “research” falls short.

It’s no secret why the VPC uses justifiable homicides in their numbers, as most defensive gun uses don’t involve an attacker/criminal being killed, rendering the entire premise of the study meaningless. And while not a scientific survey, we can easily prove that point anecdotally. 

Every day, Americas1stFreedom.org publishes at least one story, from the half-dozen or so we find on the national newswire, of an armed American defending him or herself with a gun. In fact, the NRA has been republishing those reports in some form since 1954, because they rarely receive much attention in the so-called “mainstream” media.

Each month America’s 1st Freedom publishes six to eight “Armed Citizen” stories. A quick look at these stories that occurred during 2012—the same year as VPC’s “statistics”—is quite eye-opening.

From our March 2012 issue through our March 2013 issue, we published 85 such stories, gleaned from many, many more that weren’t published due to space considerations. All involved defensive gun use—the factor VPC claims to measure but actually does not.

Of our 85 published events, 23 resulted in the death of the attacker/criminal. The highest number, 30, resulted in the attacker/criminal being injured but not killed. Another 27 involved events in which no shots were ever fired by the citizen, while five others involved shots being fired and nobody being hit. So out of the 85 incidents, 62 didn’t involve anyone being killed.

Do our “results” prove that guns are used more often for self-defense than murder? We don’t need to: Florida State University professor Gary Kleck showed back in 1993 that there were as many as 2.5 million defensive gun uses each year in the United States. A year later, the U.S. Department of Justice sponsored a study—“Guns in America: National Survey on Private Ownership and Use of Firearms”—that estimated 1.5 million defensive gun uses annually. 

What we do show is that for stories we reported on from 2012, far more self-defense episodes involved a different outcome than the attacker/criminal being killed in a shooting ruled a justifiable homicide. In doing so, we prove conclusively that VPC once again cherry-picked numbers to try to “prove” that defensive firearms uses seldom occur—which is simply not true.

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.