This Mayor Actually Said What Gun-Control Activists Advocate For

by
posted on December 2, 2020
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
1024px-wisconsin_state_capitol_building_during_tulip_festival.jpg

After someone shot eight people in a local mall, the mayor of Wauwatosa, Wis., Dennis McBride (D), actually said, “Guns have no place in shopping malls or other places in which crowds of people gather. Mayfair (mall) has a strict no-gun policy. If the shooter had complied with that policy, no one would have been hurt yesterday.”

This comment went viral, as a lot of people mocked the mayor’s naiveté. But, in his defense, this mayor was merely saying out loud what anti-Second Amendment groups and politicians often advocate for, as they often argue that “no-gun zones” somehow save lives. They argue this even though most mass-murderers seem to purposely choose to commit their atrocities in such zones.

Police described the incident as “the result of an altercation between two groups of people,” but have stopped short of saying it was gang-related. At least four of the victims were simply bystanders to the fight. As this was being written, all of the victims were recovering, and police had announced a 15-year-old boy had been arrested as the alleged perpetrator.

The mall’s “strict” policy says firearms and illegal weapons are prohibited, and that “guests who do not act responsibly may be asked to leave.” (There’s no word on whether mall officials asked the shooter to leave for not acting responsibly.)

Mayor McBride later tried to clarify his remarks by saying, “There are people who break rules and laws. I see a deeper problem in society. Children shouldn’t have guns. Mayfair has a strict no-gun policy. People should not bring guns to malls.”

Clearly, no one told Mayor McBride about the concealed-carry permit holder who shot and killed a woman who opened fire on customers at a Tulsa shopping center earlier this year, or other such incidents that were stopped by armed citizens in Washington, Kentucky, Oregon, Texas, Illinois, and Tennessee. This is in addition to the various other attacks in churches, businesses, and restaurants that were thwarted by armed citizens.

In fact, according to research from the FBI, out of 50 mass-shooting incidents in 2016-2017, 10 were ended by civilians, including four where lawfully armed civilians thwarted mass shootings. “Their selfless actions likely saved many lives,” the FBI report notes.

An earlier report, conducted from 2000 to 2013, noted that 26 out of 160 active-murderer incidents (16%) were ended by civilians, including five incidents where the civilians were armed.

Records of civilian intervention in 2018 show five of 27 shootings featured citizen intervention, two by armed citizens. In 2019, civilians intervened in five of 28 mass shootings, two by lawfully armed citizens. (Some research indicates these FBI totals are undercounted.)

Tellingly, Joe Biden’s benighted “gun-control czar” Beto O’Rourke was confronted on this issue a year ago. While promoting his confiscation schemes, CNN’s Alisyn Camerota challenged Beto: “You expect mass shooters to follow the law?” After an awkward five-second pause, Beto said, “Our fellow Americans will follow the law, yes.”

While considering government restrictions on carrying arms, 18th century Italian philosopher and criminologist Cesare Beccaria observed ( later quoted by Thomas Jefferson), “Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”

Responsible politicians owe it to their constituents to own these manifest truths rather than indulging in deadly fantasies that ultimately render victims defenseless.

(David Burnett is an ICU nurse based in Detroit, Mich. He holds degrees in business, nursing and law and is a frequent contributor to America’s 1st Freedom.)

Latest

17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg
17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg

Another Example of What Actual Free Speech Does for the Second Amendment

This is the sort of truth bombing X can now give us—thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social-media site—if we are discerning about who we follow and take the time to be cautious about what we believe.

Hawaii Wants to Go Further Than Mere “Aloha Spirit” in Defiance of Citizens’ Rights

Within weeks of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, Hawaii lawmakers are moving on legislation to find other ways to keep citizens’ Second Amendment rights effectively off-limits.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

In a poignant rebuke of the Massachusetts handgun roster, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Granata v. Campbell.

Armed Citizen Interview: NYC Homeowner

Moshe Borukh heard glass breaking downstairs in his Jamaica Estates home in Queens, N.Y., around 2:40 a.m. Borukh grabbed his pistol and investigated. He soon discovered that a man was inside his home.

Why Did This NFL Offensive Tackle Get Arrested in NYC?

Rasheed Walker thought he was following the law when he declared he had an unloaded Glock 9 mm pistol in a locked case to a Delta Air Lines employee at LaGuardia Airport in New York City on January 23.

The NRA Weighs in on “Unlawful Users”

With the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled to hear United States v. Hemani on March 2, the NRA, along with the Independence Institute and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.