What’s Wrong With Waiting Periods

by
posted on May 7, 2015
waiting-periods-main-image.jpg

Deferring the delivery of a firearm to its would-be owner for days after it has been purchased is a tactic long embraced by those who would curtail the right of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves and their families. Yet most Second Amendment supporters realize that waiting periods—as rare as they are nowadays—can be dangerous to those needing to defend themselves against a known threat.

Consider the hypothetical case of a single Milwaukee mother who has been threatened by an ex-husband and has filed for a restraining order against him. Still, he has told her he plans to kill her and their kids the next time he sees them. Knowing a piece of paper won’t keep her safe, the mom goes to her local gun shop and picks out a revolver, only to learn she must wait two days to take possession of the gun. The next night her husband breaks into her house and, despite her begging and pleading, beats her to death with a hammer. That scenario is exactly what those pushing to get rid of Wisconsin’s mandatory waiting period on handguns sales want to avoid in the future. And the measure has met with some success so far.

Last month, Senate Bill 35 was passed by the Wisconsin state Senate on a voice vote. Authored by Republican State Sen. Van Wanggaard, the measure would repeal Wisconsin’s antiquated 48-hour waiting period for handgun purchases. The measure is now under consideration in the State Assembly, and Gov. Scott Walker has previously indicated he’ll sign the measure if it makes its way to his desk.“Background checks can now be accomplished in hours instead of days. Why delay a law-abiding citizen the right to exercise their Second Amendment right to purchase a handgun?”—Milwaukee County Sheriff David A. Clarke

Wisconsin’s 48-hour rule for handgun purchases was first enacted in Wisconsin in 1976, prior to background checks on handgun sales. Due to the advent of instant background checks, such as the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), the 48-hour waiting period has become an unnecessary time tax on both the purchaser and the dealer. SB 35 would repeal the waiting period requirement and allow a licensed firearm dealer to transfer ownership of a handgun following notice from the Department of Justice that the background check indicates that the purchaser is not prohibited from possessing a firearm.  

Waiting periods are largely a thing of the past, and Wisconsin is far behind the times. In fact, the state is one of only eight that have a waiting period for transfer of firearms after a sale. And Wisconsin’s law only covers handgun sales—not sales of rifles and shotguns. Milwaukee County Sheriff David A. Clarke has been outspoken in support of repealing the waiting period mandate. He sees the law as a nuisance to law-abiding gun purchasers, while not being a deterrent to crime.

“Background checks can now be accomplished in hours instead of days,” Clarke told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. “Why delay a law-abiding citizen the right to exercise their Second Amendment right to purchase a handgun?"

Still, many on the anti-gun side of the equation favor the waiting period—including the editorial board at the Sentinel

“Waiting periods are justified, given the often impulsive acts of people intent on hurting themselves or others,” the Sentinel printed in a recent op-ed piece. “Suicide, in particular, is often an impulsive act and often involves the use of a firearm. Do we need to make it easier? The same can be said for many domestic disputes.”

Fortunately for the hand-wringers at the Sentinel, the question of waiting period effectiveness has already been answered. An August 2000 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association looked at the federal waiting period in place during the 1990s and concluded it was not associated with reductions in homicide rates or overall suicide rates.

Such facts should be enough to change the minds of those anti-gunners pushing to keep the waiting period. Since many of them know the facts and still support the transfer delay, perhaps the thought of that single Milwaukee mother fighting for her life might make them rethink their position.

In closing, we’ll borrow a favorite line from the anti-gunners in wrapping up our case for repealing Wisconsin’s waiting period: “If even one life is saved, it will be worth it.”

Latest

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau

Confiscation in Canada

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's authoritarian zeal to disarm his citizens is a warning to any free people–and it shows how fundamentally important our constitutional protections are.

America's Rifle

Gun-control activists and politicians don't want citizens to know the truth about these semi-automatic rifles. So here is the history, and the contemporary facts, about these rifles.

The New Balance of Power

Almost as soon as the voting was over, President Biden once again said that he wants to sign a ban on pretty much every firearm sold in the U.S. Though he likely doesn't have the votes to do so in this Congress, this balance of power does give him some opportunities to go after our freedom.

The Story Behind the Sale of Barrett Firearms

“Today marks the beginning of a new chapter in the Barrett story,” says Ronnie Barrett.

Why the Legal Fight in Illinois Matters So Much

When a governor, along with a majority of a state’s legislators, decide to take a civil right from American citizens, they have decided to start a constitutional fight.

The Armed Citizen® January 27, 2023

True stories of the right to keep and bear arms.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.