NYT Campus Carry Op-Ed Ignores Important

posted on May 16, 2017

In a hand-wringing op-ed posted to its website on Monday, The New York Times editorial board lamented that two more states have passed campus-carry laws.

“Police and university officials, who had strongly opposed the law as dangerous, now are burdened with making it work in the face of all manner of unanswered questions,” the writers whined. Yet the editorial completely ignored two critical points.

First, campus carry doesn’t “arm” anyone. It merely lets an individual who is already licensed to carry a firearm for self-defense in a particular state to continue to do so when he or she crosses an invisible boundary onto a college campus. Equally important, the nine states that already had campus-carry laws on the books before this spring have had no murders on campus by carry permit holders.

So what’s the Times editorial board really up in arms about? Apparently, they simply hate freedom.

Latest

AP930691352982
AP930691352982

The Real Data on Violent-Crime Rates

While much of the mainstream media are quick to prop up President Joe Biden’s (D) failed administration with reports that violent crime is falling dramatically in the United States, a new analysis by the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) proves those reports to be untrue.

The Armed Citizen® April 26, 2024

True stories of the right to keep and bear arms.

Shooting Straight With Robert J. Cottrol

Robert J. Cottrol, a law and history professor, noticed that a lot of Americans need to better understand the Second Amendment. He decided to do something about it.

SCOTUS to Hear Another Second Amendment Case

The U.S. Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear a case that challenges the ATF’s so-called “ghost gun” rule later this year.

Trump Promises to Protect the Second Amendment

With a full arena watching at the NRA Great American Outdoor Show, Trump was met with repeated cheers. Here is what he had to say.

Hawaiian Judges Thinks the “Spirit of Aloha” Invalidates Our Rights

These Hawaiian judges decided that the words plainly written in the state’s constitution don’t actually mean what they say.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.