5 Reasons You Shouldn’t Believe Everytown’s State Rankings

by
posted on January 18, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
blocks-fake-fact-media-bias.jpg (1)

The gun-control group Everytown for Gun Safety releases an annual report ranking states on a scale from “National Leaders” to “National Failures,” with, as you might expect, “National Failures” representing the freest states. Ultimately, the organization employs some oddly weighted criteria to determine that states with stricter gun laws have fewer firearm-related deaths.

The issue with that claim is that it is so provably false. Here are five reasons why you should take Everytown’s rankings with a pound, not a grain, of salt.

  1. Combining a bunch of different gun laws into one number isn’t an accepted research practice.

John Lott, president of the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC), has been debunking annual reports like this for decades. Before Everytown, the Brady Campaign conducted a similar ranking using equally flawed measurements to obtain the results they desired.

“Lumping all the different gun-control numbers into one number is pretty arbitrary,” Lott said in an earlier analysis. “Not only is there the issue of what gun-control laws to include, there is also the issue of how to weight them.”

  1. By establishing its own parameters, Everytown can bias laws to achieve its desired results.

A closer look at the Everytown “study” reveals that those analyzing the data arbitrarily assign different gun-control schemes a varying number of points based on how “important” they deem them to be. For instance, the “Level 1” gun laws, worth up to six points each, include state background checks and/or purchase permits, red-flag laws, a lack of stand-your-ground laws and a requirement for a concealed-carry permit.

“This discretion allows a lot of possible data manipulation,” said Lott. “You can exclude or include what laws to use in constructing your score based on how it is correlated with homicides or suicides.”

It’s notable that Everytown’s four preferred laws that accumulate the most points all arguably conflict with the U.S. Constitution. Some have been declared unconstitutional by various courts and may need to be resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court, and others may be in the future.

There are 10 “Level 2” laws valued at three points each, including bans on “high-capacity” magazines and “assault weapons.” Sixteen additional gun laws are classified as “Level 3,” worth up to 1.5 points each, while another 20 laws are categorized as “Level 4,” valued at up to one point.

  1. The results don’t consistently reflect Everytown’s premise of more gun laws, less crime.

Everytown’s rankings just don’t add up. Colorado is ranked number 12 in the nation for “gun law strength,” placing it at the top of Everytown’s “Making Progress” category. But its “gun violence” rate of 16.7% is higher than all the states in the “Missing Key Laws” category except one, and was higher than 6 of the 10 states identified as having “Weak Systems,” including Texas, and higher than three of the states identified as “National Failures.”

New Mexico reflects the same trend, with the 16th highest in “gun law strength” but the fourth highest gun violence rate. On the other hand, New Hampshire was ranked 38th for “gun law strength,” but had a “gun violence rate” lower than 42 other states!

  1. There is no proof of causation.

Putting that aside, even if Everytown’s claim were true, it wouldn’t change matters because their research does not show that those laws caused lower rates of violent crime. They simply attempt to make the case that states with stricter gun laws happen to have less crime, and their twisted data doesn’t even make that case well.

If the research were valid, the parameters acceptable and the rankings accurate, it would still only show a correlation between gun laws and violent crime, not that one caused the other.

  1. This use of data clearly shows that Everytown does not care about the American people.

If Everytown actually wanted to make America safer, they would endorse policies proven to reduce violent crime; instead, they are doing backflips in order to twist statistics to promote their preferred anti-freedom agenda. This is counterproductive. Does Everytown even care about the victims of violent criminals? This fake rating of states does not help anyone.

Latest

17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg
17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg

Another Example of What Actual Free Speech Does for the Second Amendment

This is the sort of truth bombing X can now give us—thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social-media site—if we are discerning about who we follow and take the time to be cautious about what we believe.

Hawaii Wants to Go Further Than Mere “Aloha Spirit” in Defiance of Citizens’ Rights

Within weeks of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, Hawaii lawmakers are moving on legislation to find other ways to keep citizens’ Second Amendment rights effectively off-limits.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

In a poignant rebuke of the Massachusetts handgun roster, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Granata v. Campbell.

Armed Citizen Interview: NYC Homeowner

Moshe Borukh heard glass breaking downstairs in his Jamaica Estates home in Queens, N.Y., around 2:40 a.m. Borukh grabbed his pistol and investigated. He soon discovered that a man was inside his home.

Why Did This NFL Offensive Tackle Get Arrested in NYC?

Rasheed Walker thought he was following the law when he declared he had an unloaded Glock 9 mm pistol in a locked case to a Delta Air Lines employee at LaGuardia Airport in New York City on January 23.

The NRA Weighs in on “Unlawful Users”

With the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled to hear United States v. Hemani on March 2, the NRA, along with the Independence Institute and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.