Book Review | "Gun Control And Gun Rights: Understanding The Debate Over Gun Violence"

by
posted on October 10, 2017
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
17-nrz-011_book-review_main_10-10.jpg

What Phil Gallman brings to the gun control discussion is an objective, investigative examination of the facts without the polemics or bias found in much of the literature. Gallman has been an assistant professor of electrical engineering and a contractor in the defense and intelligence communities. (I read his book about marine radar, Radar Reflectors for Cruising Sailboats, that helped me understand the facts about making a boat more visible on the high seas.) So it is with Gun Control and Gun Rights, in which Gallman applies a lifelong association with firearms and an analytical mind to become a voice of reason—a tour guide through the maze of opinions, misquotes and junk science.

An excerpt from the preface sets the tone for what you can expect:

About 31,000 people die in the United States each year through the misuse of firearms, including 19,000 suicides, 11,000 murders and 500 accidents. The usual response to the carnage is to demand stricter gun control or even outright confiscation of guns in civilian hands. However, current efforts using gun control are not reducing gun violence. The author argues that usual efforts to reduce gun violence are ineffective because they are misguided and misinformed.

The book is organized so the reader can select a single topic of interest. For example, thumb to the chapter on “Other Gun Ownership Issues,” find “Universal background checks and the gun show loophole,” and you will read:

An often quoted figure is that 40 percent of gun purchases are conducted without any background check. This is then followed by the statement that we need universal background checks, i.e., a NICS background check on every firearm transfer. While it is certainly possible to acquire a firearm in some situations without a background check, doing so is not really a loophole in the law, and it is not just an issue with gun shows. There is a lot of confusion and misleading information surrounding gun purchases that need to be clarified.

Gallman then presents the relevant federal laws and points out that the misguided 40 percent quote from The Washington Post used a 1997 U.S. Department of Justice Report that was based on data collected in 1993-1994.

The book includes the thorough collection of in-depth research that I expected from an experienced author and disciplined research scientist who is very familiar with guns. However, I was surprised to discover how easy to read the concisely presented, 202-page volume was. Reading this book, I learned several new things and was reminded of a few more I had forgotten. Gallman’s book will be appreciated by both Second Amendment advocates and anyone who would benefit from a factual “intervention.” 

To purchase a copy for yourself or for a friend in need, go to Amazon.

A retired U.S. Marine, Chip Lohman is also a former manager of NRA Youth Programs and the former managing editor of Shooting Sports USA magazine. He is currently the deputy executive director of publications at the NRA.

 

Latest

The Armed Citizen
The Armed Citizen

The Armed Citizen® January 21, 2026

Around 7 a.m. on Nov. 7, 2025, near Los Angeles, a 79-year-old Vietnam War veteran heard his duplex tenant screaming. He found a naked 30-year-old man had forced his way into the woman’s home.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division is Hiring Second Amendment Attorneys

After Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Civil Rights Division, was a guest on Gun Talk Media with Tom Gresham, NRA-ILA reported that Dhillon is “embracing a new style of litigation on behalf of the Second Amendment.”

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.