If You Want Less of Something, Tax It

by
posted on September 2, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
Monopoly board
(Brad Walker)

The “One Big Beautiful Bill” passed through Congress and was signed by President Donald J. Trump (R) on July 4. It included a provision eliminating the $200 excise tax on suppressors, short-barreled firearms and “any other weapons” as defined by the National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934. The tax ends as of 2026.

These days, most federal gun control relies on an expansive reading of the Commerce Clause. But when it came to the NFA, the Roosevelt administration and members of Congress subscribed to the old maxim “if you want less of something, tax it.” This, after all, is a tactic gun-control-supporting politicians use today and have long used to disenfranchise citizens who don’t have the time or money to navigate the system.

Interestingly, also in 1934, an engineer named Charles Darrow reimagined the board game Monopoly, transforming it from an anti-capitalist game into the board game we know today; in fact, Darrow included an Income Tax space that gives players landing on it two options: Either pay $200 or pay 10% of their total worth. He included this space to teach people about the punishing nature of arbitrary taxes.

In either case, the $200 tax was severe in 1934. According to U.S. Inflation Calculator, $200 in 1934 is equal to $4,797.99 today’s dollars.

Over time, this $200 tax became more affordable for normal Americans. Today, in the 42 states that don’t outright ban suppressors, these hearing-saving devices are popular despite the $200 tax, the paperwork and having to wait for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to register and approve the sale.

Unfortunately, the application and registration process for a suppressor (as well as for the firearms for which the tax was zeroed out) is still in the NFA. The NRA lobbied to end the need for citizens to apply to the ATF for what amounts to a permit for these common arms. That language did not make it through the reconciliation process.

“While the final bill is far from perfect, this bill represents the first major reduction of taxes imposed on law-abiding gun owners in decades. Additionally, the bill opens the NFA to new legal challenges which could finally put an end to the NFA and its infringement on our Second Amendment Rights,” wrote NRA-ILA.

Legal challenges, indeed; just after the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill, the NRA issued a joint statement with the American Suppressor Association, Firearms Policy Coalition and the Second Amendment Foundation announcing plans to file a "new strategic lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of the NFA in Federal Court.”

Without the tax, the NFA is nothing more than an unconstitutional gun registry for suppressors and short-barreled firearms.

So, stay tuned; this fight is not over.

Latest

House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith
House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith

The Greatest Second Amendment Victory in a Century

On July 4, 2025, Americans celebrated not only our nation’s independence, but also the restoration of our constitutional Second Amendment rights becoming unconstrained by burdensome and arbitrary fees.

Opening Salvo | More Evidence That Gun-Control Groups are Freaking Out

With the Trump administration’s law-and-order push showing America’s crime problem is clearly not the fault of lawfully armed citizens, gun-control groups are freaking out.

John Rich has a Song for Armed Citizens

John Rich's latest song is "The Righteous Hunter." It is a moving tune about standing up to stop those with evil intentions. It is a song for lawfully armed citizens.

This Department of Education Grant Could Change Things

The University of Wyoming’s Firearms Research Center has been awarded a nearly $1 million grant by the U.S. Department of Education to develop a nationwide program on the origins, meaning and implications of the Second Amendment.

From the Editor | Charlie Kirk Lived for Freedom

“Give me liberty, or give me death,” are the immortal words of Patrick Henry spoken on March 23, 1775, to the Second Virginia Convention in Richmond, Va. His impassioned words were a call to arms against British tyranny.  

Ninth Circuit to Revisit Background Checks on Ammo Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted rehearing en banc in Rhode v. Bonta—a case backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle and Pistol Association. 

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.