Initiative 1639 is so Bad, Police Oppose It

by
posted on October 9, 2018
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
remote.jpg

Law enforcement units have to deal with guns a lot—guns being used by criminals, guns being carried by law-abiding citizens and guns of their own that they rely on in their jobs. So it would be fair to say that have expertise when it comes to evaluating gun laws, and Washington’s ballot initiative is so bad, key police groups oppose it.

The 30-page ballot initiative, known as I-1639, is a bold attempt to strip law-abiding gun owners of their constitutional rights and the right to protect themselves. Among other things, I-1639 so broadly defines “assault weapons” that ordinary, recreational firearms in common use fall under its auspices. It also allows the government to confiscate firearms. And, despite the fact that its liberal backers refer to it as common-sense gun safety, it would do nothing to reduce the incidence of violent crime.

Police realize it.

The Washington State Sheriffs Association (WSSA) during a meeting on Sept. 26, 2018, made a motion opposing Initiative I-1639. The motion carried.

The Washington Council of Police & Sheriffs (WACOPS) said the initiative flies in the face of law enforcement’s purpose. "WACOPS believe that Initiative 1639 contains provision that are in clear violation of both state and federal individual constitutional rights, which, as law enforcement, officers, WACOPS members are sworn to uphold,” the group’s Executive Director Teresa Taylor said.

And the Washington State Law Enforcement Firearms Instructor Association (WSLEFIA) said, "Initiative 1639 is being promoted as a public safety measure; those actually working law enforcement know that IT WILL DO NOTHING TO STOP A SINGLE CRIME. This initiative has nothing to do with ‘assault weapons’ and is directed only at our good citizens who already pass multiple background checks before owning a firearm.”

Voting on the measure starts Oct. 19. It’s time for Washington voters to make their voices heard. For more information about the scope of I-1639 and why you should oppose it, go to Initiative1639.org.

Latest

17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg
17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg

Another Example of What Actual Free Speech Does for the Second Amendment

This is the sort of truth bombing X can now give us—thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social-media site—if we are discerning about who we follow and take the time to be cautious about what we believe.

Hawaii Wants to Go Further Than Mere “Aloha Spirit” in Defiance of Citizens’ Rights

Within weeks of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, Hawaii lawmakers are moving on legislation to find other ways to keep citizens’ Second Amendment rights effectively off-limits.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

In a poignant rebuke of the Massachusetts handgun roster, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Granata v. Campbell.

Armed Citizen Interview: NYC Homeowner

Moshe Borukh heard glass breaking downstairs in his Jamaica Estates home in Queens, N.Y., around 2:40 a.m. Borukh grabbed his pistol and investigated. He soon discovered that a man was inside his home.

Why Did This NFL Offensive Tackle Get Arrested in NYC?

Rasheed Walker thought he was following the law when he declared he had an unloaded Glock 9 mm pistol in a locked case to a Delta Air Lines employee at LaGuardia Airport in New York City on January 23.

The NRA Weighs in on “Unlawful Users”

With the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled to hear United States v. Hemani on March 2, the NRA, along with the Independence Institute and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.