Maine Ballot Initiative Puts Gun Rights On The Chopping Block

by
posted on June 30, 2016
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
maine-ballot-puts-gun-rights-on-the-chopping-block.jpg

A Michael Bloomberg-backed anti-gun ballot initiative—which would only affect law-abiding citizens, not criminals—will be included on the November ballot in Maine as Question 3, the secretary of state has announced.  

Question 3 would make common firearm transfers illegal unless conducted through a federally licensed firearm dealer, absent limited and narrow exceptions (in other words, it would institute so-called “universal” background checks). And Bloomberg’s astroturf groups have funneled more than $3 million into the initiative that proponents claim promotes gun safety, but would simply be ignored by criminals.   

Currently, it is illegal to knowingly sell a firearm to someone who is a prohibited person. Likewise, it is a felony for a prohibited person to buy, own or possess a firearm. However, this initiative seeks to make drastic and unnecessary changes to current laws that will place excessive restrictions on law-abiding citizens rather than addressing the true problems associated with straw purchases and the lack of enforcement of current laws.The U.S. Department of Justice even admitted in a 2013 report that laws like this would be entirely unenforceable without requiring full gun registration.  

As NRA-ILA recently pointed out in an action alert, Question 3 claims in the title that it only pertains to gun sales, when in fact it applies to all firearm transfers, with very limited exemptions. Further, these exemptions are vague and misleading. For example, a firearm transfer between two law-abiding Mainers would be legal at an “established shooting range,” while that same transfer would be illegal elsewhere. This will potentially turn honest, law-abiding citizens into accidental criminals.  

There are several more good reasons Mainers should vote “No” on Question 3—and encourage their family and friends to do likewise: 

There are already background checks for all firearm sales through licensed dealers. These dealer sales make up the vast majority of all firearm sales and are required by law to be run through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). 

The proposed law would only cause an undue burden on law-abiding Maine gun owners. Criminals by their very nature circumvent the laws. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 77 percent of inmates surveyed acquired their guns through theft, the black market, from drug dealers, through straw purchase or from family and friends.    

And as NRA-ILA has pointed out, “universal” background checks are not universal because criminals will never comply with these requirements. The U.S. Department of Justice even admitted in a 2013 report that laws like this would be entirely unenforceable without requiring full gun registration. And with limited safety resources, this deeply flawed initiative would also place an excessive burden on law enforcement. 

In truth, Question 3 is an unenforceable, unfunded mandate on law-abiding citizens that will only divert law enforcement’s already scarce resources. Make no mistake, the real goal of this Bloomberg initiative is the registration of all firearms. 

USE YOUR POWER!

NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action is rallying Maine gun owners to oppose Question 3. To sign the pledge to oppose the Bloomberg Gun Control Question 3, click here.

Latest

William A. Bachenberg
William A. Bachenberg

President’s Column | What a Year It Has Been!

Wow! How fast a year has gone by since being elected president at the end of April last year! My first column was titled “It’s A New Day At The NRA,” and included the following:

Standing Guard | We Are the Good Citizens

I am a big believer in transparency. Each individual needs privacy from unconstitutional government intrusion—this especially includes what guns a law-abiding American citizen might own—but an association of freedom-loving citizens must be transparent.

U.S. v. Hemani Arguments

On March 2, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in U.S. v. Hemani. The case involves a defendant who is fighting a federal indictment for possessing a firearm while being a marijuana user.

President’s Column | Getting You Up to Speed

A lot of things have occurred over the past month or so that not all members are completely aware of. I’ll use my column this month to update you on some important issues—transparency.

Standing Guard | The NRA Gathers to Celebrate Our Freedom

The momentum we’re seeing across the country is both encouraging and energizing. January opened with tremendous activity at the NRA booth during SHOT Show, where members, industry partners and supporters stopped by to connect, share ideas and reaffirm their commitment to freedom and the Second Amendment.

Port Authority Doubles Down on Constitution-Free Zone with High-Profile Arrest

As anyone who has passed a basic civics class knows, the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. All legislation and official government actions are subject to its limits.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.