Kamala Harris Thinks the Government Can Walk Right Into Your Home

by
posted on September 26, 2024
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
Kamala Harris
(Gage Skidmore via Flickr)

It’s no secret that Vice President Kamala Harris (D) and her running mate, Minn. Gov. Tim Walz (D), openly detest the constitutional right to keep and bear arms, despite their comments to the contrary, but it is incredible how far they think they can go.

“We’re going to require responsible behaviors among everybody in the community, and just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn’t mean that we’re not going to walk into that home and check to see if you’re being responsible and safe in the way you conduct your affairs,” Harris told a group of reporters in a 2007 press conference.

The government intrusion Harris suggests is unconstitutional. The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

Harris’ troubling comments came during a press conference with then-San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom (D) as they promoted gun-control legislation that would punish gun owners who “improperly” stored their firearms.

“When we create laws, it’s not only about creating an opportunity, if you will, to prosecute someone for committing a crime, but more importantly, when we legislate our values, it’s about trying to encourage certain types of behavior,” said Harris at the time.

Newsom would go onto sign the legislation, bundled with other gun-control measures, saying at the time that, “San Francisco now has the strictest anti-gun laws in the county.”

Though these comments are from 2007, Harris’ recent comments show that she has not changed. In the most-recent presidential debate, she said, “We’re not taking anybody’s guns away,” while simultaneously promoting bans on millions of semi-automatic rifles lawfully owned by American citizens.

Harris also said during her 2020 presidential campaign that if Congress did not pass her preferred gun-control policies within 100 days, she would take executive action to circumvent the legislative branch. “Upon being elected, I will give the United States Congress 100 days to get their act together and have the courage to pass reasonable gun safety laws. And if they fail to do it, then I will take executive action,” said Harris.

Her record paints a clear picture, and Harris’ nearly two decades worth of comments show that she is opposed to the peoples’ Second Amendment-protected rights.

Latest

House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith
House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith

The Greatest Second Amendment Victory in a Century

On July 4, 2025, Americans celebrated not only our nation’s independence, but also the restoration of our constitutional Second Amendment rights becoming unconstrained by burdensome and arbitrary fees.

Opening Salvo | More Evidence That Gun-Control Groups are Freaking Out

With the Trump administration’s law-and-order push showing America’s crime problem is clearly not the fault of lawfully armed citizens, gun-control groups are freaking out.

John Rich has a Song for Armed Citizens

John Rich's latest song is "The Righteous Hunter." It is a moving tune about standing up to stop those with evil intentions. It is a song for lawfully armed citizens.

This Department of Education Grant Could Change Things

The University of Wyoming’s Firearms Research Center has been awarded a nearly $1 million grant by the U.S. Department of Education to develop a nationwide program on the origins, meaning and implications of the Second Amendment.

From the Editor | Charlie Kirk Lived for Freedom

“Give me liberty, or give me death,” are the immortal words of Patrick Henry spoken on March 23, 1775, to the Second Virginia Convention in Richmond, Va. His impassioned words were a call to arms against British tyranny.  

Ninth Circuit to Revisit Background Checks on Ammo Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted rehearing en banc in Rhode v. Bonta—a case backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle and Pistol Association. 

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.