White House Makes Anti-Freedom Positions Clear Ahead of Election

by
posted on November 1, 2024
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
White House
(Robert Lyle Bolton via Flickr)

“Ban assault weapons now,” the White House’s official account posted Wednesday on X, accompanied by the caption, “It’s time.”

The post comes less than a week before the 2024 election and on the back of countless claims from President Joe Biden (D)—and yes, he is technically still the sitting president—that nothing he or Vice President Kamala Harris (D) want to do infringes on the Second Amendment.

“From our cold, dead hands,” replied the NRA with an American flag included.

The renewed call to ban “assault weapons” also follows the Harris’ recent claims that former President Donald Trump (R), if elected again, would “terminate the Constitution” and noted that she is the one in favor of the Second Amendment.

Harris’ campaign issues page echoes this call as well, stating, “She’ll ban assault weapons.”

She also previously said on the debate stage in September: “We’re not taking anybody’s guns away. So, stop with the continuous lying about this stuff.”

The reality is that banning rifles lawfully owned by millions and millions of Americans does violate the Second Amendment and she has also been in favor of gun confiscation.

Estimates from the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) show that there are more than 28 million AR-type rifles in circulation. They are clearly protected under the “common-use” standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court in D.C. v. Heller (2008). With nearly 30 million of these rifles owned by law-abiding Americans, that standard is easily met.

As for the ban that Biden and Harris are so eager to impose, its previous iteration showed how ineffective these bans are. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban, passed in 1994 and that sunset in 2004, was found to have little, if any, effect on crime.

“The congressionally mandated study of the federal ‘assault weapon ban’ of 1994-2004 found that the ban had no impact on crime, in part because ‘the banned guns were never used in more than a modest fraction of gun murders,’” reported the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (ILA).

Latest

William A. Bachenberg
William A. Bachenberg

President’s Column | What a Year It Has Been!

Wow! How fast a year has gone by since being elected president at the end of April last year! My first column was titled “It’s A New Day At The NRA,” and included the following:

Standing Guard | We Are the Good Citizens

I am a big believer in transparency. Each individual needs privacy from unconstitutional government intrusion—this especially includes what guns a law-abiding American citizen might own—but an association of freedom-loving citizens must be transparent.

U.S. v. Hemani Arguments

On March 2, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in U.S. v. Hemani. The case involves a defendant who is fighting a federal indictment for possessing a firearm while being a marijuana user.

President’s Column | Getting You Up to Speed

A lot of things have occurred over the past month or so that not all members are completely aware of. I’ll use my column this month to update you on some important issues—transparency.

Standing Guard | The NRA Gathers to Celebrate Our Freedom

The momentum we’re seeing across the country is both encouraging and energizing. January opened with tremendous activity at the NRA booth during SHOT Show, where members, industry partners and supporters stopped by to connect, share ideas and reaffirm their commitment to freedom and the Second Amendment.

Port Authority Doubles Down on Constitution-Free Zone with High-Profile Arrest

As anyone who has passed a basic civics class knows, the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. All legislation and official government actions are subject to its limits.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.