Meet the Head Cheerleader for More Gun Control

by
posted on May 9, 2021
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
cheerlead.jpg

Jen Psaki, the new White House press secretary, does not enjoy answering questions, but when required to do so, she has two stock replies. The first is, “I’m going to circle back.” Psaki circles back on everything, perhaps bringing a new meaning to the term “spin.” The second is to point to the immutable characteristics of the figure being discussed, as if it has any bearing on the issue at hand. “I would point out first,” Psaki likes to say, before going on to explain that the subject at hand is a woman or a minority or a Catholic or what you will, and then quickly moving on. Transparency, let’s say, is not Psaki’s strong suit.

Which makes it all the more interesting that, on the question of gun control, Psaki is so bold. We are told incessantly that the Biden administration is guided above all else by “moderation,” and yet whenever the topic of restricting the Second Amendment is raised, that administration’s press liaison becomes visibly excited. Gun control, Psaki has confirmed, is “a priority” to President Biden “on a personal level.” Indeed, she says, Biden has made “a personal commitment” to limit gun rights, would “love to see action,” “is happy and eager” to “take on the NRA” and “hasn’t ruled out” acting without Congress. On most other topics, Psaki demurs from the outset. On this one, she positively emotes.

At least, she emotes until she is asked for specifics. Having been invited in early February to outline in more detail the “action” that President Biden would “love to see,” Psaki returned to form: “I don’t have anything to preview for you at this point,” she said, “in terms of what the policy will look like or what form it will take.”

We all know what President Biden hopes to achieve, of course, because his campaign website spelled it out in no uncertain terms. He hopes to institute every single one of the many bad gun-control proposals that have been floating around since 1975.

Jen Psaki knows what President Biden hopes to achieve, too, because, before she was employed in her current role, she was openly zealous about the matter. During the Democrat primaries in 2020, Psaki responded to Beto O’Rourke’s extraordinary and politically suicidal call for the confiscation of the most-commonly owned rifle in America by tweeting, “Thank You @BetoORourke TAKE GUNS. PLEASE! No one needs an assault weapon. This is a crisis.” On another occasion, Psaki tweeted, “Gun Registration. yes yes yes. It is a public health emergency and if any issue gets mothers out to the polls it should be this one.”

As it turned out, the prospect of stricter gun control got almost nobody “out to the polls,” which might go some way to explaining why there exists such a profound gap between the Biden administration’s enthusiasm for gun control in general and its unwillingness to add details from the podium. It seems fairly safe to suggest that Jen Psaki will not be shouting “TAKE GUNS. PLEASE” from the White House briefing room, nor exclaiming “Gun Registration. yes yes yes.” And why not? Well, because, as I write, the people of the United States are continuing to break firearms sales records, the number of first-time gun owners is still rising, and state after state is loosening, rather than restricting, its carry rules. And the midterms are coming.

Thus are we witnessing the unlovely paradox of an administration that is blasé in theory about limiting an elementary right, but nervous when challenged on the particulars. Will Psaki eventually drop the act, put meat on the bone and risk alienating the public? On that, I’ll have to circle back.

Latest

17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg
17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg

Another Example of What Actual Free Speech Does for the Second Amendment

This is the sort of truth bombing X can now give us—thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social-media site—if we are discerning about who we follow and take the time to be cautious about what we believe.

Hawaii Wants to Go Further Than Mere “Aloha Spirit” in Defiance of Citizens’ Rights

Within weeks of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, Hawaii lawmakers are moving on legislation to find other ways to keep citizens’ Second Amendment rights effectively off-limits.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

In a poignant rebuke of the Massachusetts handgun roster, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Granata v. Campbell.

Armed Citizen Interview: NYC Homeowner

Moshe Borukh heard glass breaking downstairs in his Jamaica Estates home in Queens, N.Y., around 2:40 a.m. Borukh grabbed his pistol and investigated. He soon discovered that a man was inside his home.

Why Did This NFL Offensive Tackle Get Arrested in NYC?

Rasheed Walker thought he was following the law when he declared he had an unloaded Glock 9 mm pistol in a locked case to a Delta Air Lines employee at LaGuardia Airport in New York City on January 23.

The NRA Weighs in on “Unlawful Users”

With the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled to hear United States v. Hemani on March 2, the NRA, along with the Independence Institute and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.