Meet the Head Cheerleader for More Gun Control

by
posted on May 9, 2021
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
cheerlead.jpg

Jen Psaki, the new White House press secretary, does not enjoy answering questions, but when required to do so, she has two stock replies. The first is, “I’m going to circle back.” Psaki circles back on everything, perhaps bringing a new meaning to the term “spin.” The second is to point to the immutable characteristics of the figure being discussed, as if it has any bearing on the issue at hand. “I would point out first,” Psaki likes to say, before going on to explain that the subject at hand is a woman or a minority or a Catholic or what you will, and then quickly moving on. Transparency, let’s say, is not Psaki’s strong suit.

Which makes it all the more interesting that, on the question of gun control, Psaki is so bold. We are told incessantly that the Biden administration is guided above all else by “moderation,” and yet whenever the topic of restricting the Second Amendment is raised, that administration’s press liaison becomes visibly excited. Gun control, Psaki has confirmed, is “a priority” to President Biden “on a personal level.” Indeed, she says, Biden has made “a personal commitment” to limit gun rights, would “love to see action,” “is happy and eager” to “take on the NRA” and “hasn’t ruled out” acting without Congress. On most other topics, Psaki demurs from the outset. On this one, she positively emotes.

At least, she emotes until she is asked for specifics. Having been invited in early February to outline in more detail the “action” that President Biden would “love to see,” Psaki returned to form: “I don’t have anything to preview for you at this point,” she said, “in terms of what the policy will look like or what form it will take.”

We all know what President Biden hopes to achieve, of course, because his campaign website spelled it out in no uncertain terms. He hopes to institute every single one of the many bad gun-control proposals that have been floating around since 1975.

Jen Psaki knows what President Biden hopes to achieve, too, because, before she was employed in her current role, she was openly zealous about the matter. During the Democrat primaries in 2020, Psaki responded to Beto O’Rourke’s extraordinary and politically suicidal call for the confiscation of the most-commonly owned rifle in America by tweeting, “Thank You @BetoORourke TAKE GUNS. PLEASE! No one needs an assault weapon. This is a crisis.” On another occasion, Psaki tweeted, “Gun Registration. yes yes yes. It is a public health emergency and if any issue gets mothers out to the polls it should be this one.”

As it turned out, the prospect of stricter gun control got almost nobody “out to the polls,” which might go some way to explaining why there exists such a profound gap between the Biden administration’s enthusiasm for gun control in general and its unwillingness to add details from the podium. It seems fairly safe to suggest that Jen Psaki will not be shouting “TAKE GUNS. PLEASE” from the White House briefing room, nor exclaiming “Gun Registration. yes yes yes.” And why not? Well, because, as I write, the people of the United States are continuing to break firearms sales records, the number of first-time gun owners is still rising, and state after state is loosening, rather than restricting, its carry rules. And the midterms are coming.

Thus are we witnessing the unlovely paradox of an administration that is blasé in theory about limiting an elementary right, but nervous when challenged on the particulars. Will Psaki eventually drop the act, put meat on the bone and risk alienating the public? On that, I’ll have to circle back.

Latest

House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith
House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith

The Greatest Second Amendment Victory in a Century

On July 4, 2025, Americans celebrated not only our nation’s independence, but also the restoration of our constitutional Second Amendment rights becoming unconstrained by burdensome and arbitrary fees.

Opening Salvo | More Evidence That Gun-Control Groups are Freaking Out

With the Trump administration’s law-and-order push showing America’s crime problem is clearly not the fault of lawfully armed citizens, gun-control groups are freaking out.

John Rich has a Song for Armed Citizens

John Rich's latest song is "The Righteous Hunter." It is a moving tune about standing up to stop those with evil intentions. It is a song for lawfully armed citizens.

This Department of Education Grant Could Change Things

The University of Wyoming’s Firearms Research Center has been awarded a nearly $1 million grant by the U.S. Department of Education to develop a nationwide program on the origins, meaning and implications of the Second Amendment.

From the Editor | Charlie Kirk Lived for Freedom

“Give me liberty, or give me death,” are the immortal words of Patrick Henry spoken on March 23, 1775, to the Second Virginia Convention in Richmond, Va. His impassioned words were a call to arms against British tyranny.  

Ninth Circuit to Revisit Background Checks on Ammo Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted rehearing en banc in Rhode v. Bonta—a case backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle and Pistol Association. 

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.