Oregon Vies for Title of State with Most-Restrictive Gun Laws

by
posted on January 23, 2019
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
oregon.jpg

The Oregon 2019 legislative session recently started and bills that are designed to further infringe on citizens’ Second Amendment rights were in the hopper before the gavel even fell. And the proposals put the state in the running for ending up with the title of being the most-restrictive state in the nation when it comes to gun rights.

Senate Bill (S.B.) 501 offers a wide-ranging set of parameters that would make it difficult for law-abiding gun owners to exercise their right to keep and bear arms. The proposed infringements in this one bill are numerous. First, it would require a permit to buy (or even receive) a firearm. That permit, which would be issued only upon completion of specified training, would be good for only 90 days—after which time one would have to get a new permit. Second, S.B. 501 would limit the number of firearms one could buy within a 30-day period to one handgun and one long gun. Third, it would require appropriate locks or safes for storing the gun when it’s not in use. Fourth, it would require a person to report all lost or stolen firearms within 24 hours. Fifth, it would ban magazines that hold more than five rounds of ammunition. (We guess the Armed Citizen in Texas who had to fend off five armed intruders would have been out of luck had such a requirement existed there.) It would also mandate background checks for the purchase of ammunition and would allow a person to buy no more than 20 rounds a month.

Complementary gun control bills include S.B. 275, which addresses the storage of firearms, thus limiting one’s right to protect themselves in a home. (We all know that a bad guy who is intent on assault or worse will just smile and wait for you to unlock your gun, right?) And S.B. 87 would raise the age for purchasing long guns to 21 and would allow dealers to arbitrarily refuse to sell arms or ammunition to anybody.

Meanwhile, in the House, House Bill (H.B.) 2251 tackles the question of defining an “assault weapon” and would allow delays of up to 30 days while authorities conduct background checks.

We’ve always said that if you give anti-gunners an inch, they’ll take a mile. Oregon’s legislative agenda is more proof that they’ll never be satisfied with “common-sense” rules; instead, someone will always find a way to make the law more restrictive against the law-abiding.

Latest

House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith
House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Rep. Jason Smith

The Greatest Second Amendment Victory in a Century

On July 4, 2025, Americans celebrated not only our nation’s independence, but also the restoration of our constitutional Second Amendment rights becoming unconstrained by burdensome and arbitrary fees.

Opening Salvo | More Evidence That Gun-Control Groups are Freaking Out

With the Trump administration’s law-and-order push showing America’s crime problem is clearly not the fault of lawfully armed citizens, gun-control groups are freaking out.

John Rich has a Song for Armed Citizens

John Rich's latest song is "The Righteous Hunter." It is a moving tune about standing up to stop those with evil intentions. It is a song for lawfully armed citizens.

This Department of Education Grant Could Change Things

The University of Wyoming’s Firearms Research Center has been awarded a nearly $1 million grant by the U.S. Department of Education to develop a nationwide program on the origins, meaning and implications of the Second Amendment.

From the Editor | Charlie Kirk Lived for Freedom

“Give me liberty, or give me death,” are the immortal words of Patrick Henry spoken on March 23, 1775, to the Second Virginia Convention in Richmond, Va. His impassioned words were a call to arms against British tyranny.  

Ninth Circuit to Revisit Background Checks on Ammo Case

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted rehearing en banc in Rhode v. Bonta—a case backed by the National Rifle Association and California Rifle and Pistol Association. 

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.