Phil Bredesen’s Team Thinks Voters are “Ignorant”

by
posted on October 16, 2018
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
tennessee-state-outline.jpg

It should come as no surprise to learn that politicians lie, but Phil Bredesen’s staff members have owned up to the fact that their candidate has gotten caught trying to hoodwink Tennessee voters in a big way, all in the name of political expediency.

James O'Keefe's Project Veritas Action last week released a video showing the slap in the face to registered voters. An undercover “journalist” met with some of Bredesen’s staff members and talked about the candidate’s view on Brett Kavanaugh. Bredesen’s campaign had mentioned during a stump event that if the Democrat Senate candidate were a senator, he would have voted to confirm Kavanaugh as a Supreme Court justice.

Under the guise of disbelief, the Project Veritas agent said, “I can’t believe that he would actually vote yes.” Bredesen’s sponsor replied, “He wouldn’t. But he’s saying he would.” And it wasn’t just one staffer that acknowledged the strategic lying.

Bredesen is in a tight race against Republican Marsha Blackburn. He was down 8 points recently, and after polls showed how many Tennesseans wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, Bredesen released an ad saying he would have voted for Kavanaugh. That bald-faced lie closed the gap in early polling soon after the ad aired.

How much of a farce is the statement. Well, the ad even caught the staffers who had been going door to door by surprise, so much so that office staffers had a tough time explaining it. But the staff members in the know realized why Bredesen did what he did. They go so far as to admit that the purpose of the strategy is to sway moderate Republicans to vote for Bredesen. But, make no mistake, if Bredesen is elected, he will—in the words of his own staffers—be a good Democrat.

Asked if Bredesen made the move simply because he thinks the voters of Tennessee are that “ignorant,” a staffer said, “Yeah.”

And if there’s any doubt where he stands on the Second Amendment, look no further than the fact that he just went to New York City to participate in a fundraising event with none other than chief gun control proponent Michael Bloomberg.

It’s also worth noting that Bredesen also lied about his NRA grade. The candidate says the NRA has given him an “A” rating, but it’s really a “D.”

It’s time for voters in the Volunteer State to let Bredesen and his staffers know they’re not so ignorant that they can’t recognize a political ploy when they see one. The best way to send that message is to go to the polls Nov. 6 and vote for Blackburn.

Latest

William A. Bachenberg
William A. Bachenberg

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

More than a Quarter Million Suppressor eForms Have Been Processed by the ATF this Month

When the $200 tax stamp on suppressors and other restricted items was set to be zeroed out at midnight on December 31, 2025, last summer, it was a given that demand would explode on January 1, 2026.

Fourth Circuit Reaffirms That the Second Amendment Does Not End at the Storefront Door

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit struck down Maryland’s attempt to impose a sweeping “default ban” on lawful concealed carry on private property open to the public.

The U.S. Supreme Court Hears Wolford v. Lopez

Today (January 20), the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on Hawaii’s ban on carrying guns on private property that is open to the public—at least unless the property owner has given express consent for the carrying of guns.

What the Supreme Court Justices Said About Hawaii’s Carry Restrictions

The U.S. Supreme Court heard Wolford v. Lopez. It is a challenge to Hawaii’s law banning citizens with permits to carry handguns from going armed on any private property in the state unless the property owner has given express permission to do so. Here is what was said.

 



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.