Someone Please Hand This American History Lesson to President Biden

by
posted on July 6, 2021
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
48309270832_cd7ab85d56_k.jpg (1)
Matt Johnson courtesy Flickr

Perhaps you heard President Joe Biden (D), when defending his new gun-control efforts, claim: “The Second Amendment, from the day it was passed, limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldn’t buy a cannon.”

Sorry, President Biden, you are wrong again.

The evidence is clear that ordinary citizens could and did buy cannons; in fact, many Americans own cannons today.

This 1789 ad by the Military Laboratory in Philadelphia informed “Owners and Commanders of Armed Vessels may be supplied, for either of the use of Small Arms or Cannon, at the shortest notice, with every species of MILITARY STORES.” It lists “Rammers, sponges, worms and ladles,” “Gunner’s handspikes” and “Cannon and musket cartridge boxes of every size,” among other tools used for cannon. (Oh, and it also advertised: “Hand grenadoes, filled and fused.”) This is an ad aimed at armed merchant ships, which were common at that time. Certainly, you would not be advertising to the U.S. Navy.

In 1747, the Quakers who dominated the Pennsylvania colonial legislature refused to organize and arm a militia to deal with an impending threat of invasion. Benjamin Franklin organized a voluntary militia, which purchased, among other items, “some old cannon” from Boston, and borrowed some from New York.

John Adams wrote a letter to his wife suggesting that Independence Day in the future should be “as the Day of Deliverance by solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with Pomp and Parade, with Shews, Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more.”

“Gun” at that time referred to cannon, not small arms. You did just see celebrations with a cannon this past weekend, correct?

You do not own a cannon? Why not? When I lived in the Bay Area of California, a friend was a Civil War Reenactor. He often towed a 4-inch cannon to events. Police would sometimes pull him over, ostensibly to see if he had license for it, but mostly out of curiosity. (Yes, think of the scene in The Mask where police pull a bazooka out of Jim Carrey’s pants, and his response, “I have a permit for that.”) His response was always the same: “I don’t need one. It’s black powder.” He had fired cannonballs from it at a special cannon range back east. He claimed it was accurate to 1,000 yards and capable of firing to 1,600 yards.

The most-disturbing part of Biden’s speech was: “Well, the tree of liberty is not watered with the blood of patriots. What’s happened is that there have never been—if you wanted or if you think you need to have weapons to take on the government, you need F-15s and maybe some nuclear weapons.” So, according to Biden, the Revolutionary War had no deaths by patriots? And why would a revolution against a tyrannical government need nuclear weapons? Perhaps he has been listening to Rep. Swalwell (D-CA)’s defense of gun-control laws: “And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.”

Perhaps Biden was unaware of the Vietnam War, or Afghanistan, or the overthrow of the brutal Romanian Communist government of Nicolae Ceausescu.

America began in revolution. We celebrate this fight for freedom every July 4. The spirit of freedom is not dead in America today. It is alive and well here in this association and across America. Biden not only doesn’t understand this, but he wants to pretend freedom isn’t won and kept by patriots.

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.