This Anti-Gun Wannabe President Already Put His Left Foot in His Mouth

by
posted on April 12, 2019
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
frank-miniter-column.jpg (8)

In the long history of forgotten presidential hopefuls who ran aground due to their misunderstandings of America it is hard find a more stupefying example than Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.). Swalwell has decided that threatening to take away a fundamental civil right is a smart campaign platform.

“I see lawmakers who love their guns more than they love our kids.... I am ready to solve these problems. I am running for the President of the United States,” said Swalwell, on the “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” on Monday, just before announcing that he’d begin his campaign in Florida with a townhall event near Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

Swalwell opted not to mention the school resource officer who wimped out and didn’t go into the school to stop the murderer. He also didn’t mention all of the major blunders with the bureaucracy at every level as they failed to stop the killer again and again.

Instead, Swalwell said we need an Australian (and now New Zealand) type of gun confiscation right here in the land of the free and home of the brave. He said he is all for “banning and buying back all 15 million of the ‘assault weapons’ out there.”

Just how Swalwell is defining the political term “assault weapon” is hard to say. The only way to define what supposedly fits into this ever-expanding pejorative is by what a particular assault-weapons ban says. Likely, he doesn’t even know as he has shown his ignorance on this issue before.

“[W]e should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons,” wrote Swalwell last year in an opinion piece for USA Today.

Then, to substantiate his claim that such a national gun confiscation is constitutional, Swalwell opined that the U.S. Supreme Court hasn’t declared so-called “assault weapons” to be protected by the Second Amendment. He made this claim by noting that when the “Supreme Court held in 2008 that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that this right ‘is not unlimited’ and is ‘not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.’”

While it is clearly true that there are reasonable restrictions placed on every right, Swalwell’s claim stretches this fact to absurdity—as semiautomatic firearms are commonly owned and are easily the most popular type of firearm sold today. The case he is citing—Heller v.D.C.(2008)—also clearly says that the Second Amendment protects guns in “common use.”

Soon after writing that opinion piece, Swalwell told NBC News: “I’d make sure we get rid of detachable magazines and the pistol grip—to me that’s the feature that make it most deadly.”

A pistol grip might be more comfortable for some, and it can make it more difficult for an attacker to get a firearm away from someone. This is one reason why AR15s and other common semiautomatic rifles are ideal for home defense. But just how do pistol grips make a rifle more “deadly”?

As for detachable magazines, Swalwell clearly doesn’t have a clue how common they are with rifles and pistols—or maybe he just doesn’t care. He thinks it’s smart politics to demonize and vilify America’s 100 million-plus gun owners.

Last month Swalwell even tried to pretend to be pro-Second Amendment while hanging out with Shannon Watts, the founder of anti-gun group Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, at an event with veterans. He tweeted: “I love to shoot at the range and hang with our local vets. So we combined those today, thanks to help from @ACSOSheriffs. Was joined by @MomsDemandfounder, @shannonrwatts—an advocate for gun safety, and also a lover of our cops & vets. We had a great time!”

Gun safety is gun confiscation to Swalwell.

Most-Revealing Anti-Freedom Quote of the Week

“I’m not afraid of this guy. I’m not afraid of the NRA. I’m not afraid. No fear. #EndGunViolence” –A Tweet from Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) as he retweeted a threatening Tweet from someone and tried to tie it to the NRA.

Pro-Freedom Quote of the Week

Dana Loesch retweeted Swalwell’s Tweet and said: “Where in the world do you get that this nut job is the NRA? Another incredibly reckless accusation from someone who once said they’d nuke law-abiding gun owners if they didn’t turn in their firearms.”

Latest

17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg
17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg

Another Example of What Actual Free Speech Does for the Second Amendment

This is the sort of truth bombing X can now give us—thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social-media site—if we are discerning about who we follow and take the time to be cautious about what we believe.

Hawaii Wants to Go Further Than Mere “Aloha Spirit” in Defiance of Citizens’ Rights

Within weeks of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, Hawaii lawmakers are moving on legislation to find other ways to keep citizens’ Second Amendment rights effectively off-limits.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

In a poignant rebuke of the Massachusetts handgun roster, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Granata v. Campbell.

Armed Citizen Interview: NYC Homeowner

Moshe Borukh heard glass breaking downstairs in his Jamaica Estates home in Queens, N.Y., around 2:40 a.m. Borukh grabbed his pistol and investigated. He soon discovered that a man was inside his home.

Why Did This NFL Offensive Tackle Get Arrested in NYC?

Rasheed Walker thought he was following the law when he declared he had an unloaded Glock 9 mm pistol in a locked case to a Delta Air Lines employee at LaGuardia Airport in New York City on January 23.

The NRA Weighs in on “Unlawful Users”

With the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled to hear United States v. Hemani on March 2, the NRA, along with the Independence Institute and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.