When Definitions Become Twisted And Terms Are Hijacked

by
posted on February 9, 2017
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
17-nrz-003_julie-golob_main_2-9_oc.jpg
Photo by Michael Ives

I am a feminist, and I believe in gun safety.

It’s such a simple statement, but one that likely causes an emotional response because of two terms—“feminist” and “gun safety.”  

By definition, a feminist is a person who advocates social, political, legal and economic rights for women equal to those of men. I believe in the power of women and the true meaning of feminism. Thanks to pioneering feminists, women do have the right to vote, along with the right to speak, believe and love. When Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton rallied in my hometown of Seneca Falls, N.Y., their goal was women’s suffrage. Through their hard work and feminist ideals, we achieved it. 

As we fast-forward nearly a century, we see in the news and on the television screen how feminism and its true meaning has been stolen. The cry for awareness of valid women’s concerns has been lost and muddled in attempts to shock and awe. For the self-proclaimed “nasty feminist,” one must only believe in their version of feminism. To them, support of their opinions about what is right for women, spiritually and physically, is required of us all. They believe a woman must have the right to choose, except when it comes to protecting herself with the great equalizer—a firearm.

For these “nasty women,” hypocrisy and emotions reign. Unlike Susan B. Anthony—who said, “I declare to you that woman must not depend upon the protection of man, but must be taught to protect herself, and there I take my stand,”—the nasty collective demands equality, but considers self-protection to be blasphemy. They believe a woman must have the right to choose, except when it comes to protecting herself with the great equalizer—a firearm. 

The term “gun safety,” or as many gun owners prefer, “firearm safety,” has been hijacked as well. Real gun safety refers to specific rules that help prevent accidents. Treating all guns as if they are loaded, never pointing them at anything we do not wish to destroy, having good trigger discipline by keeping our finger off the trigger until ready to shoot, and always knowing our target and what is beyond it helps keep us, and those around us, safe.

Gun safety is not, however, gun control. Gun safety is not a gun registry. Gun safety is not magazine limits, gun bans or gun-free zones. Real gun safety is about practicing specific, proven safety rules when handling firearms. 

I was recently asked on social media about my thoughts on using terms like “feminism,” “gun safety” or even “assault rifle.” Do we use these words after they have been hijacked by anti-gun groups, or should we abandon them? Unlike the thieves who twist these terms to their benefit, we should strive to use them accurately. 

Unlike the thieves who twist these terms to their benefit, we should strive to use them accurately. The media’s overused term “assault rifle” hasn’t just been hijacked; it was made up entirely. It can be cited as fictitious and inaccurate. For “feminism” and “gun safety,” on the other hand, a bit of clarification can help rescue these stolen words. An example is how I restructure my opening statement. 

I believe in the feminist ideals of social, political, legal and economic rights for women equal to men, and I believe in practicing real gun safety with proven rules for handling firearms that prevent accidents and injury. 

Let’s not shy away from fact to cater to those who have no respect for the true and well-established meanings of important words and phrases. Preserve the real definitions and ideas founded in history by using them correctly. And unlike those who have hijacked them, use them justly.

Julie Golob is a U.S. Army veteran, NRA mom, competitive shooter and captain of Team Smith & Wesson.

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.