White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention Goes Dark

by
posted on February 6, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
Office of Gun Violence Prevention screen shot
(screenshot: whitehouse.gov/ogvp)

The Biden administration’s White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention is no more—at least that is what it looks like.

The small staff of the office resigned in the days leading up to President Donald Trump’s (R) inauguration, and within hours of President Trump taking office on January 20, 2025, the department was seemingly shut down, and its White House web page was taken offline.

While no official press release has been issued, the removal of the office’s online presence is an encouraging sign the Trump administration has no interest in perpetuating the anti-gun office formerly overseen by none other than Kamala Harris.

It remains unclear at this early stage whether Trump will formally dissolve the office as a statement against Biden’s approach, allow it to fade away, or redirect it to actually target firearm related crime as he reorganizes the White House to fit his vision.

The White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention was created in September 2023 by the Biden administration with the supposed mandate to “reduce gun violence and to implement and expand upon key executive and legislative actions taken to help save lives.” It was responsible for developing a whole-of-government approach it claimed (without substantiation) to protect Americans from “gun violence” and played a key role in implementing the controversial Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, a law passed under Biden that was used—and misused—to put into place gun-control initiatives aimed at law-abiding citizens rather than those who commit crimes.

Despite these gambits, criminal violence escalated under the Biden administration. Violent-crime rates in major metropolitan areas surged, with cities like Chicago, Philadelphia and New York struggling with homicides and illegal firearm use.

The White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention never focused on the issues of criminal misuse of firearms. Instead, it had its fingerprints on such schemes as President Biden’s ill-advised attack on funding for hunter-safety courses in public schools, which Congress blocked. It is also embroiled itself in a scandal over alleged collusion with Everytown for Gun Safety to pressure Glock to alter handgun designs. When the company refused to comply, the office reportedly coordinated with the City of Chicago to file a legally questionable lawsuit. These actions have triggered an investigation by the U.S. House of Representatives Oversight Committee. As this was going to print, the office, along with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), has yet to comply with subpoenas issued by House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.).

Indeed, the disappearance of the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention is an encouragement for constitutional rights advocates who have long argued that gun-control measures pushed under the guise of  “public health” or “gun violence prevention” unfairly target responsible gun owners instead of criminals. The office funneled resources into restrictive policies that aimed to limit access to firearms for all rather than address the underlying dynamics of violence.

While in operation, the office had a reported $430 million mandate, drawing funds from the federal budget. This allocation raised concerns among taxpayers and Second Amendment supporters who questioned how the money was being used. With the office shuttered or, at the very least, put on ice, the financial burden on taxpayers should be reduced, allowing resources to be redirected toward initiatives that combat crime. The focus can shift away from infringing on Second Amendment rights and toward actual solutions—such as enforcing existing laws, addressing how mental health issues relate to violent crimes and targeting the small population of predatory criminals disproportionately responsible for violence in their communities.

President Trump campaigned on the promise to “Make America Safe Again,” and shutting down, or perhaps reimaging, the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention would be a step in that direction.

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.