Who Believes the “Nobody is Going to Take Your Guns Away” Line Now?

by
posted on July 1, 2020
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
line.jpg

The most accomplished of liars eventually come to believe their own lies. And so it is that the people who have been insisting for years that “nobody wants to take away your guns” cannot stop repeating that lie even when they are openly proposing the confiscation of the most commonly owned firearms in the United States. 

In March, Joe Biden threatened to slap a construction worker from Michigan after the worker told him he was worried that Biden wanted to “take away our guns.” “I’m not taking your gun away at all,” Biden said angrily, pointing his finger in the man’s face and cursing at him. “That’s bull----.” For this outburst, Biden was widely praised in the press.

But what the worker had said was not bull---- at all, and we can tell as much by looking at Biden’s own words. Asked last year by CNN’s Anderson Cooper whether “a Biden administration means they’re going to come for my guns,” Biden confirmed that it would. “Bingo!” Biden told Cooper, smiling. “You’re right if you have an assault weapon. The fact of the matter is, they should be illegal, period. Look, the Second Amendment doesn’t say you can’t restrict the kinds of weapons people can own.”

This attitude was echoed a few days before the event in Michigan, when Biden publicly told Beto O’Rourke, “You’re going to take care of the gun problem with me. You’re going to be the one who leads this effort. I’m counting on ya.” 

Given that O’Rourke is primarily famous these days for having told Americans on live television, “Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15,” and then for having sold t-shirts with those words emblazoned proudly across their fronts, one wonders what voters were supposed to assume Biden meant by this endorsement. As far as political statements go, “Bingo! You’re right” is about as straightforward as it gets.

The episode demonstrated once again that, in 2020, “we’re not going to take away your guns” has become little more than a thoughtless throat-clearing exercise. Members of Virginia’s legislature repeatedly said “nobody is trying to take away your guns” while they endorsed a bill that would have done exactly that. Gun-control groups repeat “nobody is trying to take away your guns” at the same time as they funnel money and support to politicians who openly pledge confiscation drives. Even Beto O’Rourke said it—before he didn’t. 

The “nobody is trying to take away your guns” claim is merely another way of conveying “don’t get mad at me, but....” It is a tic indulged by politicians and activists who sense deep down that their position is extreme and unworkable but who don’t quite want to admit that to themselves. Reflecting on Beto’s failed presidential run, “The View’s” Joy Behar gave the game away when she advised gun-control advocates not to announce “everything they’re going to do” ahead of time. “If you are going to take people’s guns away,” Behar counseled, “wait until you get elected and then take them away. Don’t tell them.”

Or, to put it another way: “Nobody wants to take away your guns.”

And yet, they do. The idea has gained currency among the political commentariat, which cannot seem to decide whether it is “common sense” or fringe, and so has taken to arguing both positions simultaneously; it became mainstream within the Democratic primary, nearly half of whose aspirants backed some confiscation measures by the time the contest really got going; and, this November, the presidential election is guaranteed to feature a Democratic candidate who, by his own admission, supports the confiscation of America’s favorite rifle. 

Nobody? Well, apart from.... 

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.